0
34

[–] Owlchemy 0 points 34 points (+34|-0) ago 

Just another of the endless ways that the taxpayers are bilked out of their hard earned money to publicly fund lunatics. And they wonder why the vast unwashed masses are in revolt.

0
3

[–] lord_nougat 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

You're right, the masses are revolting!

0
2

[–] clear9999 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

You said it. They stink on ice. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sztf4hcGrB4

edit: added link

0
25

[–] pyres 0 points 25 points (+25|-0) ago 

I guess someone got triggered over the word frigid.

0
3

[–] WeekendBaker 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

0
20

[–] Upnor 0 points 20 points (+20|-0) ago 

This... this can't be real.

Feminist glaciology asks how knowledge related to glaciers is produced, circulated, and gains credibility and authority across time and space. It simultaneously brings to the forefront glacier knowledge that has been marginalized or deemed ‘outside’ of traditional glaciology. It asks how glaciers came to be meaningful and significant (through what ontological and epistemological process), as well as trying to destabilize underlying assumptions about ice and environment through the dismantling of a host of boundaries and binaries. The feminist lens is crucial given the historical marginalization of women, the importance of gender in glacier-related knowledges, and the ways in which systems of colonialism, imperialism, and patriarchy co-constituted gendered science.

Sounds more like a tumblr post than a "study" but it looks like the lines between both are becoming blurry.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
0

[–] ItGoesOnAnonAnon 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Indeed, probably a cover "study" so someone could funnel that money elsewhere.

0
20

[–] NiklausTheNaked [S] 0 points 20 points (+20|-0) ago 

A critical but overlooked aspect of the human dimensions of glaciers and global change research is the relationship between gender and glaciers. While there has been relatively little research on gender and global environmental change in general (Moosa and Tuana, 2014; Arora-Jonsson, 2011), there is even less from a feminist perspective that focuses on gender (understood here not as a male/female binary, but as a range of personal and social possibilities) and also on power, justice, inequality, and knowledge production in the context of ice, glacier change, and glaciology

[–] [deleted] 0 points 36 points (+36|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
20

[–] turdovski 0 points 20 points (+20|-0) ago 

You have to be a braindead SJW feminist.

1
12

[–] AlphaWookie 1 points 12 points (+13|-1) ago 

Postmodernism, that is how.

0
2

[–] Diogenes_The_Cynic 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Money.

0
0

[–] epsilona01 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Poe's law.

0
7

[–] White_Raven 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

What the fuck does that even mean? It's fucking ice, gender is 100% unrelated. How these people summon enough brain power to pump their carbon dioxide producers is beyond me.

0
0

[–] toobaditworks 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

It is their plan to humiliate and demoralize you. It is part of a take over, a coup. Don't be distracted by their lies.

0
9

[–] pauly_pants 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

And it was a male feminist who wrote this.

1
8

[–] KingofKong 1 points 8 points (+9|-1) ago 

Male feminists are almost as despicable as female feminists. Perhaps more so. Beta as fuck.

0
5

[–] lord_nougat 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

No,they're worse because they're stupid AND they're traitors.

0
2

[–] SuperConductiveRabbi 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Probably someone clever enough to get free grant money while writing total bullshit one afternoon.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
1

[–] aeschynanthus 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Svartisen in Norway must have been named with racist inventions. The name means 'the black ice' after all.

0
5

[–] NedTaggart 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

You know, my son is in college. He is working towards a nursing degree. He is currently struggling with anatomy and physiology. He said something to me that really highlighted the crux of what might be the problem these days.

He Said, "I don't like this class as much. With Lit, Psychology and Ethics, I can bullshit my way through it. A&P is all fact-based and the BS doesn't work"

That got me to thinking about the issue we see about all the SJW's, and their fields of study. All the precious snowflakes raised in the participation trophy era with helicopter parents are finding out that their world isn't compatible with facts, so they have to either get degrees in areas where they can succeed despite their BS or try to force STEM studies to accept their BS, despite the fact that it is irrelevant to the field.

This study sounds like someone trying to re-frame fact-based studies in the context of complete and utter bullshit.

0
4

[–] SuperConductiveRabbi 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

"B" Arc theory confirmed.

Do people want fire that can be inserted nasally? These important questions must be researched.

load more comments ▼ (6 remaining)