3
41

[–] escapefromredditbay 3 points 41 points (+44|-3) ago 

that university, is now guarded against any school shooter who might try to start shit. noice

0
10

[–] luckyguy 0 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago 

Campus rapes are going to go down if the women start carrying.

Theft too, and fights.

3
29

[–] lissencarak 3 points 29 points (+32|-3) ago 

Hopefully Texas leads the way for the rest of the country.

It's 2016 after all! Haha!

4
7

[–] the-gerbil-in-my-bum 4 points 7 points (+11|-4) ago  (edited ago)

current year

current year!

current yeeaar!

*shoves hands into a niggers chest and pulls still beating heart out*

*a jew in the background screams*

2
15

[–] Joeh 2 points 15 points (+17|-2) ago 

I'd like to see this in Oklahoma. Even though I'm working and taking distance classes online I have to go for proctored exams sometimes and always have to disarm. :(

2
3

[–] Joeh 2 points 3 points (+5|-2) ago 

Two down voats and no comments :( sad days

0
0

[–] SrSysEng 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Here, have a counter-UpVoat

0
9

[–] acheron2012 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

Typical evil liberal. "I don't care if you live or die. Just give me your money. If you die in a mass shooting the feds will cover your student loans. And your alleged right to live infringes on my pretend safe space".

What good is a law that a student can have a gun in a classroom if they cannot enter their own dorm room with it? Where exactly are they supposed to sleep? It is evil little tyrants like this that make me believe the second amendment should be ABSOLUTE. No exceptions whatsoever for any reason at all. Any person denying the right would be subject to immediate 10 year prison term on first offense. That should put a flutter in their little libtard panties.

0
1

[–] klatar 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

So we lock up a property owner because they won't let you carry on their property? As far as I see it, you have no rights when it comes to somebody else's property. That includes what you can or cannot do on their property.

Now, with that being said, this is a institution owned by the public, and it should therefore care only about the law in regards to actions taken on the campus. If a person is carrying and they are doing it legally, then the school should not care or attempt to enforce additional rules. Leave that up to legislators.

0
0

[–] acheron2012 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Of course. The belief that you have ANY rights at all, beyond the right to be free of physical attack, when on someone else's property is a huge problem in society.

Our sick socialists believe they can dictate any rules that come to mind for private property but the amorphous and unaccountable "government" cannot be held to the same group think mob mentality for public spaces.

Obviously this is the exact opposite of what reason, consistency, and morals demands.

And yes, your right to be free of Physics harm on private promo only holds if you don't initiate force and leave promptly upon request. Start a fight or refuse to leave and you deserve what you get.

0
1

[–] revofire 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Can we start by arresting Obama?

1
5

[–] selpai 1 points 5 points (+6|-1) ago 

As they should.

0
1

[–] AlwaysInService 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Finally someone did it. Good job Texas

0
0

[–] PeBeFri 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

0
0

[–] thenerd 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Penn State next?

load more comments ▼ (6 remaining)