0
59

[–] 0x5f3759df 0 points 59 points (+59|-0) ago 

Because she's a woman, and therefore the victim. Whether her story is true or not is in no way relevant.

0
10

[–] Subtenko 0 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago  (edited ago)

still waiting for a woman on woman case (edit: or trans person). Figure its kinda like buttered toast against a cats belly. Dont know what could happen! x)

Have fun with that one. both sides will be arguing for days, hopefully showing their own stupidity

0
7

[–] 0x5f3759df 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

If both sides are women, you'll have to look for tie-breaking factors like race, IQ, and so on.

0
5

[–] ratsmack [S] 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

0
9

[–] 0x5f3759df 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

Since they are reporting on the bullshit, I don't mind giving them traffic.

0
52

[–] heili 0 points 52 points (+52|-0) ago 

Jackie Coakley.

If the Washington Post is too chicken shit to publish the name of a slanderous, libelous, perjurer, I'm not.

0
8

[–] Zaqwert 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

Some fool actually married her after all this. That's a special sorta beta right there.

0
6

[–] heili 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

No mercy for him. He deserves every bit of hell she's going to put him through.

0
7

[–] BottomLine 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

I didn't expect her to actually be named Jackie. All this time I thought that was just a placeholder name.

0
4

[–] lube_it_with_blood 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

It Jaqueline, but she goes by Jackie.

0
4

[–] flat_hedgehog 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

In the article, it says that the Post made an agreement with Jackie not to reveal her full name in late 2014. I can support them on sticking to their promise and encourage those who haven't made such a promise to reveal her name instead.

1
0

[–] heili 1 points 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

Why should they honor an agreement with a lying piece of shit who is completely without any honor of her own?

Washington Post just lost respect from me for refusing to name her.

0
0

[–] I_Love_Hentai 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago  (edited ago)

0
22

[–] nomenimion 0 points 22 points (+22|-0) ago 

If you're a false rape accuser, both the legal system and the American media have your back. We've known this since Duke.

0
7

[–] BottomLine 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

All I want is for them to serve one day in prison. A maximum security one. For men.

I think that's a very fitting punishment.

0
2

[–] Quawonk 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Mah Patriarchy!

0
22

[–] Quawonk 0 points 22 points (+22|-0) ago 

Pussy pass

0
6

[–] SellecksBush 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

"Jackies rape story was false. So why hasnt the media named her by now?"

Reporting on why the news hasn't been reported on.... isn't this naming her in the media, her name is literally in the headline of a media company...

I have been seeing this, and similar headlines all over my feeds. We could write a novel on the news that gets passed over. She lied, she should be prosecuted for doing so, then we should move on and ignore the hype, so that we can focus on more relevant things.

0
11

[–] wuzizname 0 points 11 points (+11|-0) ago 

She lied, she should be prosecuted for doing s

Exactly. The fault lies with the district attorney for not prosecuting and for the local police for not filing charges for false reports, if those 2 agencies did their jobs the media would have full access to her name.

0
5

[–] Broc_Lia 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Her name is in the public record now: She was named as a witness in the lawsuit against the author of the article about her. Most papers are just opting to continue calling her jackie.

0
0

[–] SellecksBush 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Her name is in the headline... Frankly I am sick of seeing it.

0
2

[–] Ruthven 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Can we start a gofundme campaign to put up billboards, across areas she frequents, with her picture, story, and a warning to men?

Think of it as a public service announcement to protect people from vicious bitches and their pussypasses.

0
2

[–] TerriChris 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

She was victimized by her false allegation against men /s

0
2

[–] Grospoliner 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

@ratsmack just so you know WashPO limits their number of views each month from IP addresses, so some people will be unable to view your link. You can use archive.is to provide an archive link that people can view.

0
1

[–] ratsmack [S] 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Archived above.

load more comments ▼ (4 remaining)