You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

6
10

[–] demi_god_dylan 6 points 10 points (+16|-6) ago  (edited ago)

Neither of those will work. The governments of Europe have said pretty clearly that nothing is changing, and the migrants don't want other houses they want your shit. They don't want to live alongside us or coexist, they want to displace us. Killing is the only solution that's going to push them back because killing is all they understand.

1
6

[–] josemon 1 points 6 points (+7|-1) ago 

So far I have only seen one example of people saying they don't want refugees and getting what they wanted. It's because they threatened to use violence.

0
2

[–] DHerpster 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Please elaborate..I love happy stories

3
4

[–] Super_Cooper 3 points 4 points (+7|-3) ago 

I am afraid that you are right. I cite the Rwandan genocide as a prime example of what a motivated population can accomplish. If a bunch of dumb niggers can pull it off, surely the ancestors of the Vikings can do it too.

1
1

[–] Renogod 1 points 1 points (+2|-1) ago  (edited ago)

So a gun to the head is preferable?wouldn't that cause more violence not only among the immigrants, but amongst the rest of Europe as well? Look I'm not in outright disagreement here. It just in my eyes seems damned if you do, damned if you don't situation. I also would rather lead by example and Not resort to violence. Is there a situation which probably wouldn't lead to bloodshed?

0
4

[–] sinjinsmythe 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

It's all ears if you can come up with one.

[–] [deleted] 4 points 1 points (+5|-4) ago  (edited ago)

[Deleted]

1
0

[–] demi_god_dylan 1 points 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

No, there is not. I wish there was but there is no other way.