You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
1

[–] catechumen 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Diane Fienstein just took aim at the Anarchist Cookbook, which is protected by the First. What if they take aim at torrents or TOR for private use? Certainly these things are used nefariously, but not always. Information isn't dangerous, people who use it can be. I also never want the government choosing what they consider to be propaganda. What if I want to get your website censored, could I not post illegal content and report it?

0
0

[–] DorkJedi ago 

A career hack taking a potshot at something they know can never pass or stand purely for political grandstanding as they approach re-election is not a good example.

0
0

[–] catechumen ago 

It's the start of what I am sure will be many more, hers was at least in the open, fear the ones buried in unrelated bills.

[–] [deleted] ago 

[Deleted]

0
1

[–] catechumen 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Let us not forget that the people have no redress to the Supreme Court, they are not elected, do not expire, and are appointed for political reasons. The ISPs shouldn't, they are just a water pipe, the people are capable of doing their own filtering.