You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
4

[–] Typo 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

"Photos that show the plaintiff clothed in an everyday or holiday situation are a tangent to general personal rights, and are less ... damaging to the reputation of the plaintiff for third parties," the court said.

Not exactly. If I went to a Satan church dressed in Satan attire and had pictures taken, I would want them to remain private because if my family saw the pictures, it could damage my reputation. People take photos of themselves doing all kinds of things that might not look good to the people they know. This law does nothing to address personal responsibility. Not sure I expected anything different.