You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
0

[–] Yukonman ago 

So you're saying we shouldn't talk about economics because the make weathermen look good?

Yeah there's lots of flaws and it's not perfect but that's why we engage in academic discussions to help better understand all variables.

I could be completely wrong but and I'm not saying to take my word for this. Come up with your opposing facts and hypothesis'. Work towards finding a middle ground. When two peopl with directly opposing views come together in economics the truth is usually in the middle.

0
0

[–] vacvape ago 

Yeah that comfortable controlled millieux is why we have suffered the insult of "trickle down economics" which is pure corruption through and through because of a few assholes that couldn't possibly be rich enough. Much like how you have "sociology" which may have been worthy of some academic discussion in so far as they adhered to some sort of unbiased scientific conventions. But the captured crap that it's devolved into is far from that and that's the crap we ought to be dealing with. Not the Is vs Ought bit. I'm saying Harper had a masters in economics, purely as the means of greasing his bias, and it was always worth less than a pile of shit.