15
136

[–] dildonkers 15 points 136 points (+151|-15) ago 

And the bad guys were only in the country because of cuck pro-migrant SJWs.

2
78

[–] neutralstrike 2 points 78 points (+80|-2) ago 

This is a terrifying truth. Blood is on the hands of SJW.

39
-34

0
14

[–] sp00kygh0st 0 points 14 points (+14|-0) ago 

Exactly. I wonder if the Syrian refugees will be mentioned at the debate tonight.

0
16

[–] edistojim 0 points 16 points (+16|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Not a single one in the debate tonight will touch that fact. Bet on it.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
0

[–] PeeNutButtHair 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Great flick.

2
0

[–] spookybm 2 points 0 points (+2|-2) ago 

"I bet the JEWS did this!!!" -said while holding Christmas lights

0
2

[–] josemon 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

As a Canadian that hates the fact we have a new prime minister that secretly want to be fucked in the ass by one of those kebabs, please bring the 2nd amendment to our country.

0
0

[–] pcy623 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

I thought guns are legal in Canada?

4
88

[–] refugee610 4 points 88 points (+92|-4) ago 

Well ... he's right. They were able to calmly execute their hostages for over an hour because there was no one able to fight back. I'm not saying the presence of an armed citizen would have changed the outcome, but a chance is better than none.

3
68

[–] jeegte12 3 points 68 points (+71|-3) ago  (edited ago)

If the people were armed, it wouldn't have happened at all; they'd have gone and done it somewhere else where the people aren't armed. Notice where shootings happen in the US.

1
62

[–] dv1155 1 points 62 points (+63|-1) ago  (edited ago)

Notice where shootings happen in the US.

Connecting the dots for anyone who doesn't know.

1
24

[–] Sosacms 1 points 24 points (+25|-1) ago 

Yes. Unfortunately gun free communities only work when everyone is on the same page. As soon as one asshole wants to shoot people, it doesn't work anymore.

0
1

[–] Kaizervonmaanen 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

If the people were armed, it wouldn't have happened at all; they'd have gone and done it somewhere else where the people aren't armed.

That's not true, ISIS attack people who are armed every day. They go after people to hold their promises. They promised to attack anyone who bombed them, then France bombed them and isis attacked them. They would have done that even if they were armed (because they attack armed people they hate every day) and they would have done that without any refugees. France have many isis supporters, many of them white french people who are not able to travel to Syria because France makes it difficult and arrest anyone who tries to go to syria so all isis supporters are in france recruiting and just filling up with no way to fight like they want to. Isis could just have used one of those guys, the reason isis use refugees is because it is scarier that there are a million people with some people who are obvious isis fighters.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

2
50

[–] Volcris 2 points 50 points (+52|-2) ago 

There is a copy pasta of this years Islamic attacks. Only one had no victims; at the draw Muhammad event in Texas when the two Islamic gunmen where smoked by civilians as soon as they got started.

1
32

[–] INTERNET_TRASHCAN 1 points 32 points (+33|-1) ago 

You are goodamn fuckin right we did.

1
13

[–] KleanRider 1 points 13 points (+14|-1) ago 

The gunmen were smoked checked by an off duty cop who was moonlighting as a security guard at the event. His identity has remained unknown I believe to protect him.

1
4

[–] HAPPYBEN 1 points 4 points (+5|-1) ago 

Source? I'd like some level of certainty that this is true because it makes me really really happy.

1
10

[–] whitewomenarewhores 1 points 10 points (+11|-1) ago 

Ammophobics are always quick to point out that it's impossible to say whether the situation would be improved by arms. They don't ask if the situation would've been made worse because they know it wouldn't be worse.

0
6

[–] toobaditworks 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Believe it or not there is a comment on that site from an idiot who says just that. "If people were armed then there would've been more deaths." I don't know if it's some retard troll or retard marxist democrat but yeah a true idiot.

1
0

[–] 3205108 1 points 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

To be fair, a whole lot more situations could arise if more people were commonly armed at airports and on planes.

0
7

[–] northportage 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago  (edited ago)

One armed citizen could have engaged the perps instead of leaving them to systematically shoot hostages, giving SWAT time to get inside, and innocents time to escape. There is actually a very big chance an armed citizen would have saved many lives, just by taking over the attackers' attention. Is that not the tactical method used at school incidents these days? Cops used to wait outside while SWAT staged. Now they are told to engage attackers immediately in order to save lives.

5
60

[–] jaceame 5 points 60 points (+65|-5) ago 

Well I'm sure they got those guns perfectly legally. Thus all legal guns have be taken away.

1
26

[–] truthhurts09 1 points 26 points (+27|-1) ago 

I get your sarcasm. Have an upgoat since at this point 2 dbags don't get it.

1
-1

[–] IdSay 1 points -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

nono, i think what mr. trump is implying is that you should be able to legally acquire suicide-bomb vests, hand grenades and perhaps a spoonful of napalm too. only then we'll feel in a safe enviroment. then there's no limit to who gets it.

[–] [deleted] 7 points 35 points (+42|-7) ago 

[Deleted]

5
16

[–] weezkitty 5 points 16 points (+21|-5) ago 

Communist is extreme socialism. Both are economic systems and neither should (in theory) have anything to do with policy such as guns

[–] [deleted] 2 points 27 points (+29|-2) ago  (edited ago)

[Deleted]

0
0

[–] NedTaggart 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Both communism and socialism demand 100% cooperation from the populace in order to work.

People who own guns for defense are more inclined to be individualist, those that want to rely on themselves rather that rely on the government.

An individualist world view does not require cooperation and is less likely to coerce those with alternate views into compliance.

[–] [deleted] 2 points -2 points (+0|-2) ago 

[Deleted]

2
-2

[–] Shekelstein 2 points -2 points (+0|-2) ago 

Orite bro chill out

[–] [deleted] 1 points 1 points (+2|-1) ago 

[Deleted]

2
34

[–] Samchay6 2 points 34 points (+36|-2) ago 

Trump - Once again, winning hearts and minds by stating the obvious

[–] [deleted] 0 points 24 points (+24|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
14

[–] epik- 0 points 14 points (+14|-0) ago 

It's sad that stating the simple truth has become a revolutionary act.

0
10

[–] arthur_dent42 0 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago 

Exactly. I never thought I'd say this but Trump is actually looking like a decent choice.

0
2

[–] superwookee 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

A one eyed king is better than a blind one that's for sure.

0
20

[–] jackofdiamonds 0 points 20 points (+20|-0) ago 

He has a much better angle on this situation than the gun control argument. All of the Republicans are against gun control. He's the only one who wants to deport all illegals and close the borders to new immigrants. Yesterday handed him a massive vindication. That should be what he's focusing on here.

2
2

[–] novictim 2 points 2 points (+4|-2) ago 

He can't call Islam what it is, a Death Cult with a Political ideology.

That loses my enthusiasm for him.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
1

[–] lissencarak 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

When he made the comment the identities of the shooters were not known (they could have been "natives", and I use that term loosely).

0
14

[–] Mouse-Ball-Z 0 points 14 points (+14|-0) ago 

Any country that has leadership that says 'we need to let them in' needs to hang their leadership.

3
13

[–] telexter2 3 points 13 points (+16|-3) ago 

You know why there are no terrorist attacks like this in Texas and Arizona? I'll give you a hint;

concealed carry.

I dare anybody to try this in either of those states. Will there be American casualties? Probably. Will every on of those terries be dead by the time the cops even turn on their sirens?

Yup.

2
11

[–] Social_Extinction 2 points 11 points (+13|-2) ago 

Jared Lee Loughner and Charles Whitman?

Look, I'm not really seeking to argue this but you gotta be a little less loosey-goosey with your citations!

0
7

[–] Voat_a_Goat_Mamma 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

He did say that some would be dead...Also, that is not a terrorist, those were lone gunmen. They were nuts, not trying to change our systems and political thought through terror.

0
0

[–] Rellik88 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Actually Muslims tried to attack Texas. They were killed, by an off duty officer that was packing heat.

I will say AZ is even less of a target because of Open Carry. You can see just how many people carry here.

13
-11
load more comments ▼ (22 remaining)