Archived Illinois School District Must Allow Transgender Student To Shower With Girls, Says U.S. Government (hngn.com)
submitted ago by iam
Posted by: iam
Posting time: 5.1 years ago on
Last edit time: never edited.
Archived on: 2/12/2017 1:51:00 AM
Views: 195
SCP: 13
14 upvotes, 1 downvotes (93% upvoted it)
Archived Illinois School District Must Allow Transgender Student To Shower With Girls, Says U.S. Government (hngn.com)
submitted ago by iam
view the rest of the comments →
[–] SpicySandwhich 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
You appear to be an idiot. I hope you can prove me wrong.
A disease is an abnormal condition that negatively effects fitness. A disease is not just any abnormality like your definition implies. If someone happened to generate rhodopsins that allowed them to be able to see in the dark that would be an abnormality, but it wouldnt be a disease. Your definition defines any evolutionary novelty as disease and is fucking stupid. A disease has to be negative. XXY , cystic fibrosis, fragile x, trisomy, all unstable repeat expansions, etc are genetic abnormalities that preclude normal reproduction and reduce fitness. They are terrible and sad, and all diseases. One of those listed is actually partly why I became a molecular biologist....
I study diseases for a living and I have used this definition in talks since grad school. So far you are the only person to find fault in it. So I would be very interested to hear a real reason my definition is incorrect, and yours, which defines any abnormality as a disease(which seams ridiculous), is superior. Please, enlighten me. I see no flaws with mine but I will change my slides as soon as you show Im wrong. But you probably cant.
[–] TheKobold ago
I guess the definition provided by google is wrong... but i doubt that, im going to go with the moron making the original statement is the moron.
[–] SpicySandwhich 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
Stupid faggot
[–] SpicySandwhich 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
I really hoped you would be smart enough to actually tell me why my definition is wrong. But your not. Your a witless fool if you can not see that there is barely a difference in our definitions. Do you really think klinefekters disease is not a disease? You can literally see the abnormalities in the chromosomes, so by your definition xxy is a disease. I dont know why I have wasted my time with you when you are 100% wrong and unable to provide an argument.
The blind followee unable to make an argument for the statement he made calling me moronic. Laughable.
But again, why is my definition wrong, and do you really think xxy is not a disease?