[–] [deleted] 0 points 80 points (+80|-0) ago 



[–] rothx 0 points 36 points (+36|-0) ago 

This is when "cunt" can and should be used. She fits the definition perfectly.


[–] dannydale_ 0 points 26 points (+26|-0) ago 

cunt can be used any time. it's just that faggot motherfuckers are too delicate.



[–] Esqueleto 0 points 45 points (+45|-0) ago 

Didn't this guy get the memo? Listen and believe. No thought, no critical thinking, no ideas. Just listening and believing.


[–] myth2sbr 1 points 7 points (+8|-1) ago 

At least when you join a cult you get free Kool-Aid


[–] the_spectre 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Not feminism. When you join feminism, you just get rape.

Lots and lot of rape.


[–] zippo 0 points 35 points (+35|-0) ago 

The comment section is gold, though. Check this out: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/men/thinking-man/11962537/Whats-so-funny-about-a-mens-rights-debate.html#comment-2333164712

(linking to comments on that site seems to be wonky, so if you don't see a comment, search for David Power and lookg for a huge comment)


[–] coldacid 0 points 112 points (+112|-0) ago 

I'm going to quote it here because it's too damn good not to share around.

It's already happening treacle.

Feminism is already a dead woman walking. In fact, all feminism has left is tired old shaming language and the State (ironically, ultimately other men) to keep men to the feminist line.

But now, increasingly, the shaming doesn't work. And men are disengaging from society in general to avoid entanglements with the state; if you don't get married, you can't be divorced, if you don't co-habit you can't have half your stuff appropriated, if you don't have children, you can't be on the hook for child support, if you don't enter the corporate world you can't be accused of 'harassment' and if you don't date you drastically reduce your chance of a false rape accusation.

These are genuine threat points for men in the modern world that didn't exist before feminism. It speaks to the feeble minds of feminists that they would think that men will simply carry on as they did when these threats did not exist. For the last 50 years men (mostly) still did. But that's over now.

So men are doing what they have always done: survey their environment, understand it, and behave rationally according to it. Which means, increasingly, living their lives without regard to what women want. This does not mean living without sex, relationships or female company. Just that the investment men make in all these areas is being dramatically reduced.

As feminism reduces the value of women (in men's eyes), so men are reducing the amount of time, effort, attention and money they are willing to spend for the declining benefits modern women now bring to their lives.

But the real news is that the true cost of feminism, first born by men, and then children, is now being passed on to women. Record numbers of women are living alone, record numbers of women are childless, record numbers are on psychiatric medication, record numbers are facing a life-time of wage slavery in grinding jobs that they can never leave. And still feminism spins these outcomes as the conscious choices of these women and as 'empowering'.

And yet, women's self-reported happiness, across all classes, all races, all demographics is lower than ever since records began 50 years ago. Tellingly, for the first time ever, their happiness is also now lower than that of men.

But you do not need to read 'The Paradox of Declining Female Happiness' to know this. Just talk to the increasing number of 30 and 40 year old childless spinsters one on one - not in a group - to get the REAL story. The REAL effect of feminism in the REAL world. These women don't give two hoots about feminism, they are just wondering where all the good husbands, hell, ANY decent man, went.

Mostly, disgusted with what feminism has done to women, he walked away.

For the truth is that men don't want to fight women, it goes against the core of what it means to be a man. But feminism thrust men into a fight that they neither started nor wanted. To the point that feminists are reduced to crowing about 'winning' battles that men never turned up for.

And even now, as feminism pushes and pushes and pushes to ever more absurd levels, as ever more restrictions are placed on normal masculine behavior, ever more insane definitions of 'rape', 'assault', and 'aggression' are drafted into law in increasingly desperate attempts to somehow, anyhow, cast women as perpetual victims - even now - men are still refusing to be drawn into a real battle.

That's how deeply men do not want to fight women.

The sound of the final battle between the sexes will not be heard in the streets or legislatures. It will not be televised or reported. There will be no flags hoisted or victory parades. Because it is already in progress. It is happening all around us in plain sight, for those with the eyes to see it.

And men are deploying the most devastating weapon of all - indifference. In this final battle who cares least wins.

The time has come to reap the harvest of feminism, and for women the fruit will be bitterest of all.

It's pretty simple, women. Either abandon feminism or abandon all hope of being wives and mothers. Because men will not abide feminism and you cannot force us to accept it. 70 years of a totalitarian government could not make communism work. And no amount of resorting to State force is going to make a feminist society viable.


[–] WhipDisco 0 points 38 points (+38|-0) ago 

The response under it is great too.

Very well said David. Well said. Yes, men en masse are doing what men do: walk away, their shoulders slumped and their hands in their pockets. However, a serious head of steam is building, as witness this comment stream and thousands of other comments on hundreds of other streams, where the anger of men is deep and resolute, and it will boil over.

Edmund Burke once said: 'People crushed by laws, have no hope but to evade power. If the laws are their enemies, they will be enemies to the law; and those who have most to hope and nothing to lose will always be dangerous.'

And Daniel Patrick Moynihan said, 'From the wild Irish slums of the 19th century Eastern seaboard, to the riot-torn suburbs of Los Angeles, there is one unmistakable lesson in American history; a community that allows a large number of men to grow up in broken families, dominated by women, never acquiring any stable relationship to male authority, never acquiring any set of rational expectations about the future -- that community asks for and gets chaos. Crime, violence, unrest, disorder -- most particularly the furious, unrestrained lashing out at the whole social structure -- that is not only to be expected; it is very near to inevitable. And it is richly deserved.'

The sneering of women like Philips will reap its harvest, of that I am in no doubt.


[–] kittysaysmeownow 2 points 23 points (+25|-2) ago 

God I hate how bad feminists make the rest of us look. They are the loud minority though. Most normal women agree that modern feminists are idiots.

The only bit I disagree with is that being childless is somehow a negative. The childfree movement is separate from the whole feminist thing, and both men and women happily participate in it. I think that's got more to do with money and a flexible lifestyle than anything else.



[–] Totenglocke 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

I don't see any comment section.. Weird.


[–] zippo 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

It's all the way at the bottom, past a bunch of links to other articles that look like they're the actual bottom of the page - and the comments are using disqus so it doesn't actually even start loading till you scroll down there. And a lot of privacy software blocks disqus.

Here's a pastebin of the thread: http://pastebin.com/XUhc1dAT


[–] Skeletor 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

If you're at work. The comment system they use could be blocked.


[–] birds_sing 2 points 30 points (+32|-2) ago 

Stop saying that this MP was laughing at men's rights issues and start saying that they were laughing at human rights issues.

It was asked that parliament take one day to discuss the unacceptable suicide rates and amount of domestic violence that is occurring every day in British homes. During this request the Labour member for Birmingham Yardley burst into audible laughter and was seen having to cover their mouth to stop themselves guffawing at the request.

People don't take men's right seriously because they are called "men's rights". They need to be called human rights. 50% of the population has a disproportionate rate of suicide. 50% of the population experiences an unacceptably high amount of domestic abuse. The victims of these types of things are human beings. Stop dehumanizing them and call them human rights issues not men's issues.


[–] Wolfeh2015 0 points 31 points (+31|-0) ago 

But they are literally men's issues. You can't treat a problem and not take into account it's demographic. If a disproportionate amount of men are committing suicide, you have to find out why they are doing it. You can't do that by ignoring the fact that they are men.

They are human issues, but specifically men's issues.

The problem is people stigmatizing men for having issues.

The problem isn't that we aren't accommodating people who laugh at men's issues by giving them a different label so they can keep their bias.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 



[–] birds_sing 2 points 1 points (+3|-2) ago 

I stick by what I said earlier. We have a problem where a certain demographic experiences a disproportionate amount of domestic abuse. Does it matter which demographic? No. The fact is that there's a problem, there are reasons why those problems exist and we as a society need to fix it. The gender affected will change how we go about fixing it, but it shouldn't determine whether or not we fix it. Or whether or not it's ok to laugh at it.

Yes we as a society stigmatize men for having issues, but how do we stop this? Do we just say, "Oh come on. Stop doing that." Or do we actually begin by having equality, where laughing at the idea of preventing domestic violence against women is equal to laughing about domestic violence about men? The person who did this was an MP. The leader of their party would have instantly had them removed from the party if they would have done this towards women. But they didn't because we don't have equality. We aren't fighting for equality. We simply say, "oh come on. Stop doing that."

These aren't specifically men's issues. These are issues, these are problems that are backed up by statistics and facts. These are issues that need to be dealt with, that need to be fixed. Who they affect will only determine how we deal with them and not if we should or shouldn't deal with them. Again, these are not men's issues, these are issues. These are not men's problems these are problems. We put value on problems, we put value on issues by assigning them gender. Women's rights, men's rights. Women's issues, men's issues. Stop putting gender on them to stop putting value on them. An MP laughed about domestic abuse and suicide while in parliament. That's what happened. That is disgusting, and they should no longer be an MP. But we as a society allow things like this to happen every day. And that's disgusting.

Yes we need to give them a different label, and when we do their bias disappears. Because you can no longer have a bias if there is no bias to be had.

Sorry for the long rant.


[–] Tsugumori 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Don't forget that this is also a minority right's issue. Men are a minority. This is literally oppression of a minority.


[–] epik- 1 points -1 points (+0|-1) ago  (edited ago)

Yet they obtain the majority of success, so they don't give a fuck that men also obtain the majority of failure


[–] josemon 4 points 1 points (+5|-4) ago 

Why not mammal issues? Or living being issues. Or better yet, reality as we know it issues?


[–] ForWhiteSake 0 points 17 points (+17|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Always amazed me how bleeding heart white feminists will eagerly cry tears and shriek about rights for "minority" men but the moment the reality of white men and their many issues comes up, they literally laugh. This sort of behavior isn't unique to the Brits.

And they wonder why we aren't breeding anymore.


[–] BrickT34 1 points 10 points (+11|-1) ago 

Did anyone expect any other response from a bunch of child raping pedophiles and their accomplices?


[–] ThisIsntMe123 0 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago 

Doesn't she look a little tired?


[–] 3009828? 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

Is that you, Doctor?


[–] JustTheDoctor 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

/u/ThisIsntMe123 isn't the Doctor.


[–] ninjajunkie 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago  (edited ago)

The youngest of the guards, who seemed about eighteen, immediately seized the head, and showed it to the people as he walked round the scaffold; he accompanied this monstrous ceremony with the most atrocious and indecent gestures. At first an awful silence prevailed; at length some cries of 'Vive la Republique!' were heard. By degrees the voices multiplied and in less than ten minutes this cry, a thousand times repeated became the universal shout of the multitude, and every hat was in the air.

-Henry Essex Edgeworth The Execution of Louis XVI

They would do well to remember what distraught young men are capable of doing.


[–] WhipDisco 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Imagine another White Terror coming out of all of this.

load more comments ▼ (17 remaining)