You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

1
1

[–] wazerbeamfire 1 point 1 point (+2|-1) ago 

That's over the top to where it doesn't make sense, obviously extinction of mankind is worthless if no one lives after.

2
-2

[–] Ancient_Unknown 2 points -2 points (+0|-2) ago 

Did you even read what the dude said? I'm gonna quote it one more time for you people, so maybe, if you slow down enough, you can read and comprehend it:

It really does not matter how many people die to protect an important freedom. And it shouldn't.

Read it very slowly so you can understand what he said. Done? Ok, now read it again, because you probably didn't get it the first time.

I was illustrating how ridiculous that comment was by taking it to an extreme example. When does it end? Is it ok for 3 billion people to die so you can keep your guns? 2 billion? 1 billion? How much is too much?

At any rate, you people are too stupid to have an actual discussion using logic and reason, which is why I usually just insult you retards, you downvote me, and we move on.

0
0

[–] wazerbeamfire ago  (edited ago)

All I did was point out that your example was extreme, by extension so was the original comment. I said fighting for rights is worthless if no one is lelt after.