5
59

[–] Amateur_Wizard 5 points 59 points (+64|-5) ago 

It's funny how I called America creating ISIS, when ISIS was the "moderate Muslims they were arming instead of going in there themselves"

It's funny though, America had her ass kicked by the yellow men in the black pyjamas. Now they created their own vietkong to lose to.

America sucks.

1
35

[–] FlintRockBone 1 points 35 points (+36|-1) ago 

I've always wondered when our military men will get tired of fighting an enemy we armed a few years before. I can kinda get it with Afghanistan, I mean there was 15-20 years between training and funneling arms to the Mujahideen and us fight them. There was 10 years between arming Saddam and gulf war 1. Both were long enough gaps that the average fighting marine wouldn't have been old enough to probably follow geo-politics. But shit this is like 3 years max. Do our troops really not understand that they are fighting a state department supplied enemy?

1
17

[–] freedumbz 1 points 17 points (+18|-1) ago 

I think the pattern goes something like this...

1) Someone is in deep trouble, and losing them (independent or not) does not align with the US agenda

2) Situation is desperate for them, so they accept US help (or are straight up created by the US from the ground up)

3) Crisis over, they are able to claim victory thanks to supply from the US

4) They take a closer look at their benefactor and discover that it really is the greater of two evils

5) They try to get away from the umbrella of the US

6) They get BTFO under a false context for doing so

0
4

[–] iam 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

They will never get tired of it because this is how they make their corporate handlers money and how they take over the world. It's 100 percent intentional. Not many mistakes happen in this arena.

1
0

[–] idle_voating 1 points 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

Great for the companies that used to only supply the US military and allied militaries with their equipment. They can also have their products bought by the US state department, sent to enemies of the US and then they get to sell the equipment used to fight those enemies of the US.

All of this is secured for the relatively minor cost of hiring some lobbyists and buying off some congressmen.

0
5

[–] RottenSausage 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Now US taxpayers are funding trucks for terrorists.

0
2

[–] KleanRider 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

This is actually what happens when you had the reins of war to a Democrat. Ironically Bush had this shit locked down then Obama came in and F'd it all up. Well not Obama but Hilloroy..

0
0

[–] Malek 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

The FSA are the secular good guys.

0
40

[–] Nefirian 0 points 40 points (+40|-0) ago 

So now the US Govt is supplying terrorists? I thought that was treason. Not to worry the masses are more worried about which selfie to take next.

[–] [deleted] 2 points 25 points (+27|-2) ago  (edited ago)

[Deleted]

0
3

[–] Iforgotmy_other_acct 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Duh. Obviously, everything bad in the world started with Apple, because the hipsters are finally starting to realize what we've all known since that company's beginning. The government isn't the only one that makes extensive use of scapegoats.

1
16

[–] TheTrigger 1 points 16 points (+17|-1) ago  (edited ago)

Dude... US funded terrorism goes back to before WWI. Hell, pretty sure it's always been around, in one way or another.
It's a damn near American Institution at this point. Like, tradition.

[–] [deleted] 1 points 13 points (+14|-1) ago  (edited ago)

[Deleted]

0
3

[–] Egon 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Hell, we've killed people with bio weapons and took their land well before WWI.

0
0

[–] shirtlords 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

That reminds me, does Iran still have any F-14's?

0
0

[–] lord_nougat 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Thanks, Hillary!

0
0

[–] CatNamedJava 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

They were supplying the free syrian army.

0
19

[–] loquito 0 points 19 points (+19|-0) ago 

Wasn't this during the time that Hilary Clinton was over the US State Department? Am I just being paranoid here?

[–] [deleted] 1 points 16 points (+17|-1) ago 

[Deleted]

0
4

[–] Tea_I_Am 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Even if her apologists want to say it was a mess she didn't create the problem, it is still damning. She failed to lead. Her term was entirely unremarkable, except for the fact that several countries feel into chaos while she was there. Sure that may not at all be her fault, but she still failed to lead in any way. Anyone could have been secretary of state and accomplished just as little

0
5

[–] Echo_of_Savages 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Fyi the Secretary of State is the only person who has the power to approve or reject arms sales to foreign countries.

1
16

[–] Spaceballs-1 1 points 16 points (+17|-1) ago 

Why would the state department deny ISIL "That great GM feeling"?

0
25

[–] coldacid 0 points 25 points (+25|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Probably because ISIL wants trucks that aren't shit.

EDIT: >yfw you bait and someone gets perfectly hooked

0
2

[–] Doomking_Grimlock 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Terrorists know how to vote with their dollars...wait, our dollars? I dunno anymore...

0
0

[–] trollingisavaccine 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago  (edited ago)

ISIL wants trucks that aren't shit.

ISIS recruits are actually defecting* over the lack of nice vehicles like in the propaganda shots.

[–] [deleted] 2 points -2 points (+0|-2) ago 

[Deleted]

3
11

[–] RedditDead2005-2015 3 points 11 points (+14|-3) ago  (edited ago)

Hard to believe the U.S. government gave $500 million to fund ISIS in Syria and possibly around the world to stir up trouble and keep the evil Muslim illusion alive. Anything for Israel, right?

[–] [deleted] 1 points 10 points (+11|-1) ago 

[Deleted]

0
5

[–] RedditDead2005-2015 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Have you read what's in The Talmud, the real Jewish Bible? Do you know what they think of non-Jews? A bit Hitlerish, no?

0
2

[–] CatNamedJava 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

You do know that the Syrian rebels and ISIL are different group who are fighting each other?

0
3

[–] RedditDead2005-2015 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

You do know that they have incredible overlap, right? Like Osama bin Laden = al Qaeda = freedom fighter against Russia and supported by U.S. Indistinguishable. It's why ISIS is driving around in Toyotas...paid for by U.S. taxpayers!

1
-1

[–] trollingisavaccine 1 points -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

Your link has nothing to do with funding ISIS. Fucking hell. If you wanna go all conspiracy and say the CIA didnt ever care who it was funding/arming to topple Assad, then drag up literally any other story which isnt talking about winding down the rebel training/arming program.

0
6

[–] Ecilsemoh 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

Hey fucksticks: The Hilux is fucking EVERYWHERE in the middle east and has been for decades.

Top Gear will help you understand why

0
6

[–] Schrodingers_Spy 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

"Greatest country in the world"

2
5

[–] mxd 2 points 5 points (+7|-2) ago 

It's important to separate the American people from the American government..

3
11

[–] SterlingItachiArcher 3 points 11 points (+14|-3) ago 

No. We allow this government to Represent us. We must take responsibility for it.

1
-1

[–] whitewomenarewhores 1 points -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

It is impossible to separate the American people from the American government. It's cucks like you that allow the government to do this shit in the first place. "Oh it has nothing to do with me!!! Now I need to pick a filter for this picture of my latte" types like you are the scum of our country.

0
2

[–] Echo_of_Savages 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

... aaand who was the Secretary of State that approved the sale of those toyotas?

0
2

[–] GenericUser 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Hitlery for Prison 2016

load more comments ▼ (13 remaining)