AV Archived Richard Dawkins questions Ahmed Mohamed's 'motives' and sparks backlash (theguardian.com)
submitted ago by TitanDisco
Posted by: TitanDisco
Posting time: 5.2 years ago on
Last edit time: never edited.
Archived on: 2/12/2017 1:51:00 AM
Views: 3011
SCP: 127
134 upvotes, 7 downvotes (95% upvoted it)
AV Archived Richard Dawkins questions Ahmed Mohamed's 'motives' and sparks backlash (theguardian.com)
submitted ago by TitanDisco
view the rest of the comments →
[–] Venom1 0 points 6 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago
Agreed. I used to be pretty liberal and believe in being PC, but things have gotten way out of hand.
[–] RoninSnowman 0 points 12 points 12 points (+12|-0) ago
Then you, my friend, are exactly part of the problem, being any PC is like saying it's ok to have a little infection, but eventually it grows and spreads into what we are seeing now. PC is a refusal to confront and question rationally and use ones sense and brains when confronted with issues, it's a way to silence opposition and disagreeing points of view when they don't fit the PC's own, I hope you do see that it is a fallacy to have any PC. Being good to everyone is ok, being PC is like giving out Aid's, and unless you're Jared, you don't want to be known for that.
[–] NikoMyshkin 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
i respectfully disagree.
growing up in 1980s UK I saw huge amounts of open racism by people from all walks of life. including people who 'should know better'. it was totally acceptable. then came PC and people at first thought it was bullshit but slowly they realised that it isn't fair to joke about and point and deny jobs/friendship etc to someone based on their skin colour. all well and good. for a while. then, as human movements are wont to do, it went too far. suddenly criticising religion makes you racist! how?? religion is a choice - it's perfectly OK to criticise choices.
we just need some common sense - stay in the middle - it's not fair to dismiss someone based on something they cannot change (eg skin colour, disability, gender) and it IS ok to judge someone on their CHOICES (eg religion, political affiliations, being obese etc) because choices are under our control. if we don't have the right to criticise and challenge people's choices then how can a manager tell a bad employee to work harder or how do we tackle the inevitable rise of people that will use religion to justify murder, beatings, paedophilia - these are not hypotheticals because they are perpetrated right now by millions in the name of religion. it is fair and just to criticise these actions. but not according to contemporary PC, that fucking cancer.
tl;dr: PC at first was useful, helpful. now it's gone too far as is a fucking cancer in that it literally threatens to destroy society by forcing a swing back to the other polar extreme (again, as human movements are wont to do - move from one extreme to the other).