19
86

[–] poodog 19 points 86 points (+105|-19) ago  (edited ago)

In a year all those "migrants" will pick up the stockpiles of guns that they've smuggled into the country, then we'll have to go in and fucking tear them out of there.

Goddamnit Europe, you're setting up World War 3, thanks you PC faggots.

2
15

[–] novictim 2 points 15 points (+17|-2) ago 

This will be a wonderful news opportunity though. Hence, the MSM wins with this.

No one ever stops to ask how the MSM played a role in bad decision making. Their censorship and propaganda always goes unpunished.

2
30

[–] physicscat 2 points 30 points (+32|-2) ago 

That BBC report from Hungary that showed them lying about how a woman and her child ended up on the train tracks is representative of the media manipulation going on right now in Europe.

0
5

[–] lissencarak 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

It's almost like it might be a bad idea to have big and powerful organizations that:

  • Have a lot of input in decision making
  • Have a vested interest in creating turmoil

0
3

[–] criminalmacabre 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago  (edited ago)

What smuggled guns? Looks like you confused civilized europe with south america or something.

1
3

[–] TheDude2 1 points 3 points (+4|-1) ago 

That's what happens over and over.

1
0

[–] nm96 1 points 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

>tfw the majority of voat is this dumb

10
65

[–] lexsird 10 points 65 points (+75|-10) ago 

RIP Europe.

They had a chance these past few days to curb this, but they've went full retard and opened their doors. This is not going to end well, mark my words. How long is it going to take before it all goes pear shaped? That's going to be interesting to call.

First we have the invasion wave, this is where they bolster their numbers broadly in masses which will overwhelm the system and allow any kind of operator of terrorism to relocate to Europe. It's hard to be an effective against the West when the West just packed up and move out of your neighborhood in mass. We kept the fight there while we were there, but we left. This has only encouraged them to think that they have won and now they can press the advantage.

They now are looking at the big fat easy prize of Europe. Europe has been pacified with it's liberal thinking, relaxing in the warm sunshine while America has done the heavy lifting of global containment of this beehive. Granted, we kicked over the bee hive and killed a strong man who was keeping these vermin in check, thinking that all people would appreciate "freedom and democracy", but it was a fools errand and served only to line the pockets of the rich.

Now this hive is on the move, and it's swarming Europe which is lost in it's dream world of naive thinking. This swarm isn't going to join Europe's culture, hold hands, and skip around a May Pole with them. They will isolate themselves, congregate together and solidify strongholds and become bases of operations.

We are in the 2nd phase, where there has been plenty before them to pioneer the way, this is the swarm that follows that will establish a beachhead. After they've fortified, they will establish pipelines to their contacts back home. They will pump in a river of drugs in order to finance their schemes. Europe's foolish youth will be strung out on powerful drugs that will be flushed through the booming blackmarket.

Look for hash and opiates to be the mainstay as they are produced in mass in the Middle East. This could already have been happening and if so, it's probably financed a cache of weapons to arm this wave of intruders with. We will see the horror of the failure of Gun Control Theory as weapons will be easy to find for these criminals while the soon to be victimized law abiding citizens of Europe will be helpless in contrast.

Authorities will be overran and the political will power will not be there to engage the military as the foolish minded and traitors will refuse to act. At some point it will be too late. Europe isn't set up with a military that can defend from a civilian insurgence. Classical warfare of army versus army is all they are ready for and even that they are lax with. Their military bases, their personal and logistics are all vulnerable and have been or will be mapped out by these invaders for quick effective insurgent strikes.

It will be seriously fucked, as the military will want to react to the distress of civilians, but their bases will need to be protected lest any military hardware will fall into the invader's hands. Imagine this nightmare, Europe's nukes fall into the hands of terrorists. That's a game changer because these people will not hesitate to burn them off on the world.

This is how Political Correctness can reach fatal levels.

1
15

[–] physicscat 1 points 15 points (+16|-1) ago 

Bigoted people aren't ready for freedom and democracy. The Muslim world was kept in check by dictators and monarchs. I was happy at first seeing the Arab Spring....but look what happened in Egypt. They elected the Muslim Brotherhood. Islam is not a religion that can thrive in a free and democratic society. They know this. Radicals will always try to repress.

2
5

[–] let_them_eat_slogans 2 points 5 points (+7|-2) ago 

What's your timeline for this doomsday scenario? It's kind of hard to imagine an armed takeover of the EU by less than 5% of the population.

2
20

[–] Kleyno 2 points 20 points (+22|-2) ago 

Armed takeover is a long way off, but in the next five years I am seeing an increase in civil unrest, stoking of racial tensions and violent protests. We'll also probably see a marked increase in terrorist attacks and further curbs on our freedoms in order to keep us safe.

3
5

[–] RumbledFeathers 3 points 5 points (+8|-3) ago 

Have you seen ST. Lous. They are less than 13% of the United States population and we have no power in this country to prevent them from burning towns to the ground and assaulting random civilians over and over again. A lot of it is because the liberal left cries bloody murder if any white people ever defend themselves.

0
0

[–] FurlessLeader 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Less than 5% of the US population defeated the British military in open conflict for control of the colonies. Do the math, 5% is a colossal number of people.

0
2

[–] Journey 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

It doesn't need to be so ultra violent.

In Islam a muslim can marry non muslim woman and his kids will be muslims.

A muslim woman cannot marry a non muslim.

So on the one side we have the many "refugees" invading europe and on the other hand we have all the cultural backwardnes of marriage, sharia law, entitlement.

So if it doesn't turn the way you described it, it will be by democracy because of their shear numbers - european culture and society will fall.

[–] [deleted] 1 points 1 points (+2|-1) ago  (edited ago)

[Deleted]

1
42

[–] erowidtrance 1 points 42 points (+43|-1) ago  (edited ago)

Depressingly true. The media and political class are ultimately responsible by guilt tripping the public into accepting hundreds of thousands of immigrants. They're playing on the lefts need to to virtue signal to push their agenda. You must be seen to be compassionate even if long-term consequences may be disastrous.

I'm not looking forward to the first terrorist attack they link back to this influx of migrants. Those who pushed for europe to take in thousands of people will have the blood on their hands.

5
23

[–] pandabill [S] 5 points 23 points (+28|-5) ago 

They already have blood on their hands. The savages are raping and pillaging their way through Europe. It's an invasion of barbarians.

1
13

[–] whitewomenarewhores 1 points 13 points (+14|-1) ago 

No, it's a genocide.

3
30

[–] sreggin_llik 3 points 30 points (+33|-3) ago 

1
6

[–] ChairmanCongFuckPao 1 points 6 points (+7|-1) ago 

The book returned to the bestseller list in 2011

Nice

2
4

[–] Chingasa 2 points 4 points (+6|-2) ago 

Just reading the plot to that on wikipedia made me a combination of sad and terrified.

2
25

[–] turd_miner91 2 points 25 points (+27|-2) ago 

Is propaganda propaganda if it's true?

3
10

[–] HumanitysPrecipice 3 points 10 points (+13|-3) ago 

No, that's when we call it "fact".

1
14

[–] Nationalist 1 points 14 points (+15|-1) ago 

Well, it's still called propaganda:

Propaganda is a form of communication aimed towards influencing the attitude of a population toward some cause or position.

1
7

[–] Sephrone 1 points 7 points (+8|-1) ago 

I do not think that word means what you think it means -- Inigo Montoya

1
0

[–] ArturiMindset 1 points 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

great movie

0
3

[–] novictim 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Propaganda is usually a picking and choosing of truthful facts meant to skew the general opinion in a particular way. Focus groups are often employed prior to the effort in order to craft the news.

What this means is that certain facts are ignored while those facts that fit the narrative are advanced.

We see this with the coverage of Islam and its followers in Europe. All the many rapes and assaults and foiled attacks are presented in the media as having occured yet with no mention of perp names or religion leaving the audience with no "dots" to connect. Europeans are left to think that there is no pattern to the violence when there actually is.

The News presents the facts minus the details. And marches for Sharia and Sharia demonstrations go unreported or reported as though the "Muslim Community" is simply asking for the right to be "left alone" and not that these people reject the civil laws established in Europe following the end of the Reformation.

Meanwhile, editorialized accounts of the "Responsibility" for Europe to shoulder the world's burdens are played up as being news when they are really just opinion pieces meant to lay a guilt trip onto the audience and to advance an agenda of mass Muslim immigration to Europe.

Europe has yet to ask the question of its citizens: "Is this policy of mass Muslim immigration a choice that the people want?"

Why is that not a news story? A: Propaganda requires only that the positive narrative favoring Mass Muslim Immigration be forwarded.

7
21

[–] pandabill [S] 7 points 21 points (+28|-7) ago  (edited ago)

Europe will be indistinguishable from North Africa in a couple of decades. Hell, in some cities that is already the case. Fucking third world scum ruining everything by making our countries the same as the shitholes they're running from. And the libshit maggots cheer them on.

0
0

[–] lissencarak 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

A country is always exactly as great as its people. The land itself means almost nothing by comparison.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 16 points (+16|-0) ago  (edited ago)

[Deleted]

2
2

[–] Zodi 2 points 2 points (+4|-2) ago 

The one voice of reason in an ocean of hate.

1
8

[–] novictim 1 points 8 points (+9|-1) ago  (edited ago)

Do you think we will be allowed to hear the stories of European pre-Christian sites being vandalized, damaged or destroyed?

Based on what I see the media doing here, I predict "NO!".

We may come to know when Rune Stones in Scandinavia, for instance, are defaced and toppled but we will never be allowed to know that these events happened at the bequest of Imams. When the ancient preChristian artwork in Pompeii are defaced, we will not be allowed to hear the names of the vandals.

When Terrorist Cells start to spring up in massive numbers, as they most certainly will, we will be told very little of who these people are and everything will be couched in the notion that this is the work of deviants, not of true Islam.

At some point, the establishment, itself, will be co-opted by Islam as blackmail and threats of violence to family members undermines civil authorities and institutions. What happened in Rotherham England and was revealed in the Alexis Jay report is not far from that reality.

But the MSM will not tell you when and if these things happen. The MSM has a narrative to forward. If a story speaks AGAINST Islam in Europe then expect to hear nothing, as in Rotherham, or only the barest of details.

load more comments ▼ (30 remaining)