You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →


[–] taxation_is_slavery 10 points -10 points (+0|-10) ago 

I doubt they were innocent, but they were probably undeserving.


[–] Pokerguy 1 points 11 points (+12|-1) ago 

Innocent means they have not committed a crime worthy of capital punishment and were not killed because of their own actions. If someone attacks you and you kill them in self defense, then they are not innocent. When you seek out someone and kill them for whatever crazy reason is floating around in your mind, that's killing innocent people IMO.


[–] taxation_is_slavery 5 points -3 points (+2|-5) ago 

Innocent implies they had never committed any wrongs, and nobody can really know that. However, in the context used it's just splitting hairs about the prevailing understanding of the word.


[–] Noordwijk 1 points 7 points (+8|-1) ago 

Lol what the fuck? I don't even give a fuck if they were harassing the guy - As wrong as it is, it doesn't justify taking the law into your own hands and taking the life of someone else.


[–] taxation_is_slavery 4 points -4 points (+0|-4) ago 

Can you read, my son?

Nowhere did I say he was justified. To proclaim someone is unilaterally innocent is not likely to make it true, I'm sure they violated noise ordinances while they were being murdered, or at least jaywalked at some point during their lives.


[–] Devildetails 1 points 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

Innocent until proven undeserving?


[–] BrianFellow 1 points -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

That psychopath who shot them had problems with everyone, everywhere he worked. Him having problems with them too implies absolutely nothing about the kind of people they were, and you're a fucking idiot if you believe otherwise.