3
104

[–] Imapopulistnow 3 points 104 points (+107|-3) ago 

How did the Swedes ever believe this "bi-cultural" plan would work in the first place?

9
135

[–] novictim 9 points 135 points (+144|-9) ago  (edited ago)

At the core of Multiculturalism is a masochistic and self hating ideology that cloaks itself in Christian ideals of generosity and cross bearing.

The elites in Sweden bought hook, line, and sinker into this Multiculturalism because giving away something that is not yours, namely your country, gives this sense of moral purpose and a conviction that you are being generous.

These politicians cannot reverse their policy now without admitting to their terrible error, that they really had no right to trade away the inheritance of native Swedes. And so they stubbornly persist even going so far as to boost immigration in the hopes that the resulting demographic shift will help their re-election prospects. Holding power becomes the ultimate vindication for them.

Sweden is at a tipping point in this regard. The people are waking up but the MSM there is censored like no other place I know. Will they fully realize the betrayal in time to save their native Culture? Stay tuned.

4
77

[–] Alopix 4 points 77 points (+81|-4) ago 

Multiculturalism is the idea that every culture has something to learn, and something to teach.

No country on the planet practices that. No, because learning things requires us to be able to look at each others' cultures and criticize them, and in the twisted Marxist version of multiculturalism that's defined as xenophobic bigotry.

31
36

[–] realpatrickstewart 31 points 36 points (+67|-31) ago  (edited ago)

At the core of Multiculturalism is a masochistic and self hating ideology that cloaks itself in Christian ideals of generosity and cross bearing.

You guys are like conspiracy theorists with your insane mental gymnastics to always bring it back to Christianity. Even when Muslims are fucking up it's still the Christians fault.

It's the Christian's fault when governments kick immigrants out (USA), it's the Christians fault when they let them in.

I'd end this with a joke, but your logic is laughable enough.

0
1

[–] eyeballfrog 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

There's something that always bothered me about multiculturalism and immigration. Why would we want a culture that turned its country into such a shithole that people are desperate to leave?

0
1

[–] Zardoz 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Great analysis and one of the best overall descriptions. You aren't wrong about the cloak of christian ideals' and I think a 'perversion' or a warped twist of them does work in selling multiculturalism with that appeal to help the poor. This is when selling multiculturalism to the people IMO.

But at its core, its proponents are decidedly antichristian. The very point and purpose for the insider advocates is to make sure christianity (that very thing making for traditional western culture (the enemy) but to make sure christianity is no longer a dominant anything. When it becomes just another among a hundred others then finally society changes.

but i did get what you were intending to communicate and I agree a kind of christian sense of sharing, giving to the poor and needy is often used in selling it to the masses.

6
40

[–] ginx2666 6 points 40 points (+46|-6) ago 

Cuck mentality.

0
28

[–] bozarkin 0 points 28 points (+28|-0) ago 

Europe is still in a phase of over-reaction to the fascist terror of the last century. It all stems from an honest and honorable attempt at preventing another right wing demagogue getting to power, not realizing the dangers of horse shoe theory.

0
9

[–] Sosacms 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

I can understand the reasoning, take people from shitty communities and show/train them how to build a flourishing community. Then it all goes tits up because if they had the mentality to build a flourishing community they wouldn't need the training. Maybe it would work if they only try integrating one family per neighborhood, but most immigrants end up grouping together to preserve that culture that destroyed their native country.

Wall up every border, no migrating until you've fixed your own shit and reach first world status.

1
-1

[–] Jihadilucario 1 points -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

What is first world status for you? Having puke/beer covered sidewalks?, greco-roman court houses, a two-party system serving the rich elites, while 50% are earning less than $30k a year even though the GPD per capita is $54k? Taking advantage of good soil and exporting corn?

Neo-Nazis like you even hate the Chinese, Japanese, and the Indians even though they have GDP in the top 10. How many wars did the 'Great Powers' lose in their former 'colonies'? Let's count them together: Algeria, Tunsia, India, Vietnam, ....

0
2

[–] guinness2 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Islam is essentially a code of conduct for violent animals given it permits pedophilia (child marriage), rape (sex slavery) and domestic violence and promote the murder of people for the "crime" of being gay and free speech (blasphemy) and religious freedom (apostasy).

How did the Swedes ever believe their culture was compatible with that of violent animals?

0
0

[–] Imapopulistnow 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Another commenter nailed it i think. It is the same as our current open border policies here. Liberal progressives need to have disaffected minority groups in order to gain enough votes to stay in power and power trumps all other considerations.

4
58

[–] Subway_Bernie_Goetz 4 points 58 points (+62|-4) ago 

How about they scramble to defend the Swedes who are being raped and murdered by third world scum? Brown on White crime = "We better defend the immigrants from a backlash!" White on Brown crime = "We need to defend the immigrants from the ever-so-pervasive racism and xenophobia!"

4
10

[–] canbot 4 points 10 points (+14|-4) ago 

If the KKK runs a rampage through the ghetto because a black guy killed a white person, the police have a responsibility to stop that rampage. One person killing another person does not justify a genocide. If there is pervasive racism and xenophobia the police also have a responsibility to protect the minority group. These are not contradictory, except in the mind of a racist.

1
23

[–] Subway_Bernie_Goetz 1 points 23 points (+24|-1) ago  (edited ago)

Yes, if the KKK is rampaging. But they aren't. The usual refrain after immigrant violence is "oh no, there might be a backlash!" There never is one. That is what makes the focus on "preventing a backlash" over everything else so ridiculous. Again, let's review the immigrant violence narrative:

  1. Immigrant commits savage, grisly, heinous crime with a distinctly third-world flavor to it against a white (decapitation, for instance)

  2. Government implies that whites are racist and are about hurt lots of immigrants.

  3. Whites do nothing.

  4. Rinse and repeat.

0
3

[–] whatthehelldamnguy 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

And if the immigrants are the racists ones who specifically target white people the police have no responsibility at all? Otherwise they would be racist I guess.

0
2

[–] corsairio 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Why should we protect other races?

0
0

[–] chuck45532 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Can we have a little consistency in your views here, please?

We saw in Ferguson and Baltimore that the police did NOT stop the rioting, looting, and burning. In Baltimore, the mayor actually ordered the police to stand down and give the rioters "space to destroy". In Ferguson, the owner of the market that Micheal Brown robbed had his store looted multiple times. An Asian-owned store called Beautytown fared even worse. It was looted 3 times between the shooting of Michael Brown and the handing down of the decision not to indict Officer Darren Wilson before finally being burned to the ground the week of the riots. In Baltimore, the middle-eastern owner of a pizza shop not only had his establishment burned to the ground, they actually tried to set HIM on fire too! These are the innocent minorities being terrorized by the majority black residents of those cities.

You say that you believe the police have the responsibility to protect minorities from rampagers. If only you can apply that same belief when the rampagers are black. But we all know that to the black lives matter activists, any attempt to do so by the police would face accusations of "racism", and I suspect you would be one of those on the front lines hurling those accusations.

1
44

[–] Zaqwert 1 points 44 points (+45|-1) ago 

Shouldn't the SWEDISH police be protecting SWEDISH citizens from the mob of savages their irresponsible government has vomited into their country the past decade?

2
24

[–] StrongStyleFiction 2 points 24 points (+26|-2) ago 

Logic has been banned in Sweden.

[–] [deleted] 3 points 42 points (+45|-3) ago  (edited ago)

[Deleted]

0
27

[–] WellThatsWeird 0 points 27 points (+27|-0) ago 

And as a consequence, IKEA will stop selling knives in its stores? Wtf..? I can imagine it now:

Headline:"A wooden chair was taken, dismantled, and a leg was used to club members of society to death." IKEA: "Yeah, we can't sell chairs anymore as they can be used as a means of killing people."

Shit is ridiculous.

0
23

[–] SlipperyChicken 0 points 23 points (+23|-0) ago  (edited ago)

People have been joking for a long time about the UK or some other European country banning knives once something like this happened. I know it's not the entire country, but an entire store chain refusing to sell knives is close enough. It shows that mindset is alive and active. This is another piece of evidence that helps prove that the people arguing the slippery slope have valid concerns. It's just one more step or maybe 2 until you have to get a background check in Sweden for a set of steak knives.

I don't understand how people can immediately target an object and think that removing that object will solve their problems. It's like a weird form of idol worship. The people banning things reflexively are transforming an object into some sort of mystical thing that has magical power over people's decisions. Knives, guns, and weapons in general have become a kind of magical devil figure to the people with this mindset.

0
3

[–] Nationalist 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Assault chairs should be banned, they look scary.

[–] [deleted] 3 points -1 points (+2|-3) ago 

[Deleted]

0
15

[–] weezkitty 0 points 15 points (+15|-0) ago 

It’s IKEA’s fault for displaying knives in the store.

Seriously? Way to ignore the real issue

0
9

[–] guinness2 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

Yes, IKEA should have hidden the knives behind knife-burqas so Muslims don't see naked knives and become overwhelmed and start acting on their violent beliefs and murdering random people for Allah. Allhu-Akbar!

0
0

[–] binglederry 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

The beheading was an early rumor based on a crappy cell phone photo. Also, the murderer is apparently a Christian from Eritrea.

Still fucked up though.

7
41

[–] ginx2666 7 points 41 points (+48|-7) ago 

Finally. If double homicide committed by a paki wouldn't wake up Swedes, I don't think what would.

[–] [deleted] 2 points 34 points (+36|-2) ago 

[Deleted]

6
29

[–] ginx2666 6 points 29 points (+35|-6) ago 

  1. "Paki" means "any arab immigrant", at least in UK. It's a derogatory term, only a little less vulgar than "sandnigger".

  2. I'm sure they will wake up, I'm only afraid it will be too late. Pakis are the biggest contributors to redpilling nations, mainly because they're thieving, violent, good for nothing wastes of welfare.

2
16

[–] sillymanilly 2 points 16 points (+18|-2) ago 

Yea, i think Sweden is proably lost too and will become the base of operations for the war that is coming. Too bad. It really is a pretty place. By the time the West gets it back from the swarm of islam it will be a wasteland.

1
4

[–] senpaithatignoresyou 1 points 4 points (+5|-1) ago 

Oh no, the moment their quality of life slips, they will wake up, and become nasty.

considering swedes have started firebombing immigrant centers, it may have already started.

5
5

[–] qvazzler 5 points 5 points (+10|-5) ago 

Can confirm, am Swede and wondering why everyone is giving so many fucks about this. I guess it's nice to be an observer everyone once in a while, amirite my US friends.

0
18

[–] Irollthenickles 0 points 18 points (+18|-0) ago 

You're losing your country friend, problem?

2
10

[–] Reichsmarschall 2 points 10 points (+12|-2) ago 

4
2

[–] ginx2666 4 points 2 points (+6|-4) ago 

Considering those mudslims are about to get a bridgehead near white, racially homogenous and almost completely free of pakis Europe, you can kinda see why we're getting worried. I doubt US citizens care about that - comments here are from fellow Europeans watching in sorrow how another nation falls to muslim disease.

0
1

[–] LordOfDragons 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Sweden is fucked up. I doubt this will change anything; worse has happened with no change.

0
0

[–] sozcaps 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Finally.

Does it bring you relief that people were murdered?

2
27

[–] randillion 2 points 27 points (+29|-2) ago 

I feel we may see a pogrom if this keeps up against the Muslim immigrants.

2
25

[–] novictim 2 points 25 points (+27|-2) ago  (edited ago)

"Pogrom" is a properly negative term in that it judges people based on a label but not on their individual chosen beliefs.

But holding people individually to account for their held beliefs that are antithetical to democracy, to secular rule of law, and to universal human rights should not be confused with a mindless mob pogrom.

Holding people to account for their beliefs is legitimate. If a country or society chooses to deport people who are dangerously opposed to the Western values upon which that society is founded, that country or society should be applauded for their common sense and willingness to defend those values.

Tolerance of intolerance is not tolerance but is suicide. Society is not a suicide pact.

3
-3

[–] lasercow 3 points -3 points (+0|-3) ago 

as long as you are fighting ideas not people and trying to change minds not demographics.

5
25

[–] watitdew 5 points 25 points (+30|-5) ago 

Would be a step in the right direction.

1
4

[–] A_Fringe_Element 1 points 4 points (+5|-1) ago 

If that's what's necessary to ensure the survival of Swedes in their own lands so be it. The answers to today's problems lie in the past.

3
19

[–] sortathrow 3 points 19 points (+22|-3) ago 

Good. Sweden for Swedes!

3
16

[–] BoiseNTheHood 3 points 16 points (+19|-3) ago  (edited ago)

This is another reason why we need Trump in the White House. I don't want a POTUS who's more concerned with making illegals feel welcome than preventing their constituents from getting killed. Let's not pull a Sweden here.

0
4

[–] knightwarrior41 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

do you honestly think that trump will keep his promises if by some miracle he gets elected?nah,he was a sponsor of a multi cultural beauty pageant remember? those types of people dont change their minds like that

1
-1

[–] MrPim 1 points -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

If elected he's never be able to pull it off even if he wanted too. Deport all the illegals here would take years. And building a wall is just not going to happen, and would be largely ineffective if it was built. The Dons plan sounds good in a hand wavy kinda way. But put up against the real world it's a fail (and he hasn't given any actual details on how he intends to accomplish all this. Are we talking fence, or actual block built wall? details details).

0
2

[–] Exastii 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

This is completely different. You don't see Mexicans beheading Americans in the name of the cartel now do you? Sweden should know better than to allow any immigrants into their country when ISIS is right in their backyard. ISIS and the cartels have different motives.

The Cartels are reasonable and their killings are done for self gain, not in the name of allah or any dead motherfucker. In a way, they're similar to our government They'd rather do business with Americans than wage war against us. This is why you hear about the cartels buying hookers for DEA agents and whatnot.

If the cartels scare you so much and you want to bring an end to them, you're going to have to tackle corruption instead of building a very expensive wall.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
0

[–] lasercow 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

these people are serious

load more comments ▼ (32 remaining)