You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
I already explained that. The candidate is the one who has standing because they are the one who receives direct personal injury from violations of the constitution. As of right now, none of the president's suits have been rejected.
Having standing involves making a complaint for which the court is able to deliver a remedy. SCOTUS already signalled that the fraud opened a constitutional can of worms, this could simply be their way of throwing it into the too hard basket.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] selpai 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
You must be joking. If states don't have standing, then who does?
[–] Buff_Awesome ago
I already explained that. The candidate is the one who has standing because they are the one who receives direct personal injury from violations of the constitution. As of right now, none of the president's suits have been rejected.
[–] selpai ago
hmmm
[–] SerialLarper ago
Having standing involves making a complaint for which the court is able to deliver a remedy. SCOTUS already signalled that the fraud opened a constitutional can of worms, this could simply be their way of throwing it into the too hard basket.