You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
[–]gramman74[S]0 points
0 points
0 points
(+0|-0)
ago
The latest evidence comes from samples collected during Red Cross blood drives last year and analyzed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in a study published on Monday.
Researchers tested 39 blood samples from California, Washington and Oregon that were collected between Dec. 13 and Dec. 16, 2019. At the time, no one in the United States had heard of COVID-19. The Chinese government didn't even acknowledge its existence until Dec. 31. And yet, every one of those samples came back positive for coronavirus antibodies. Keep in mind that antibodies don't develop for at least a week after exposure to the virus.
Again, we have NEVER had a test for CV-19. We still don't and we certainly didn't before we knew it existed.
The current CV test does not test for CV-19 or anti bodies to CV-19. The labs have not isolated CV-19 which fuels consiracy theories that CV-19 doesn't even actually exist.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] FreeinTX 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
There is no evidence of that.
The covid test doesn't show covid 19, exclusively.
[–] gramman74 [S] ago
[–] FreeinTX 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Again, we have NEVER had a test for CV-19. We still don't and we certainly didn't before we knew it existed.
The current CV test does not test for CV-19 or anti bodies to CV-19. The labs have not isolated CV-19 which fuels consiracy theories that CV-19 doesn't even actually exist.