You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
"A media outlet that renounces its core function -- pursuing answers to relevant questions about powerful people -- is one that deserves to lose the public's faith and confidence. And that is exactly what the U.S. media, with some exceptions, attempted to do with this story: they took the lead not in investigating these documents but in concocting excuses for why they should be ignored."
Which is EXACTLY THE FUCK UP The Intercept did. Theres nothing about the article thats crazy, its tight and definitive
view the rest of the comments →
[–] ArcturianDeathTrap3 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
Heres the article The Intercept wanted to gut. Pro-tip: You can't, it only has typos. Its incredibly well done
https://greenwald.substack.com/p/article-on-joe-and-hunter-biden-censored
"A media outlet that renounces its core function -- pursuing answers to relevant questions about powerful people -- is one that deserves to lose the public's faith and confidence. And that is exactly what the U.S. media, with some exceptions, attempted to do with this story: they took the lead not in investigating these documents but in concocting excuses for why they should be ignored."
Which is EXACTLY THE FUCK UP The Intercept did. Theres nothing about the article thats crazy, its tight and definitive