You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
[–]folgeyharry0 points
3 points
3 points
(+3|-0)
ago
(edited ago)
The wikipedia talk page explains their reasoning. They only accept "Reliable Sources", which just happen to be all left-wing, such as CNN, MSNBC and even Vanity Fair. OTOH, Fox News, NY Post, or Washington Examiner, are all unreliable, so nothing they say is included. The left wing media all claim it's false, so, to them, therefore it is. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Biden%E2%80%93Ukraine_conspiracy_theory#Discussion
view the rest of the comments →
[–] folgeyharry 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago (edited ago)
The wikipedia talk page explains their reasoning. They only accept "Reliable Sources", which just happen to be all left-wing, such as CNN, MSNBC and even Vanity Fair. OTOH, Fox News, NY Post, or Washington Examiner, are all unreliable, so nothing they say is included. The left wing media all claim it's false, so, to them, therefore it is. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Biden%E2%80%93Ukraine_conspiracy_theory#Discussion
[–] jxfaith 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Which is funny, because the NY Post broke the article that triggered this entire ckusterfuck.