Posted by: TREDDITFIRST
Posting time: 2 months ago on 10/26/2020 11:56:45 PM
Last edit time: never edited.
Views: 1259
SCP: 332
336 upvotes, 4 downvotes (99% upvoted it)
~59 user(s) here now
OA = Opinion / Analysis
MT = Misleading Title
UVS = Unverified Source
NSS = Non-standard Source
IV = Instant Video
V = News via Video
AV = Article with Supplementary Video
-Moderators will apply these flair tags
1. No Paywalls: The link must be easily accessible, without signing up or spending money. Please use an archive for known paywall sites or include one in the comments section.
2. No URL Shorteners or Redirects: Link directly to the article. Archive links are allowed.
3. Please translate non-English articles: Use Google Translate in the link or post the translation in the comments.
4. No Memes
Having trouble submitting? Check the list of banned domains.
/v/USNews
/v/OldNews
/v/technology
/v/MeanwhileOnReddit
/v/WarFollowing
NSFW: No Authorized: No Anon: No Private: No Type: Default
Content violates spam guidelines
Content contains or links to content that is illegal
Content contains personal information that relates to a Voat users real world or online identity
Content or User violates User Agreement
Hi, it looks like you're new. Welcome to Voat!
Voat is a censorship-free community platform where content is submitted, organized, moderated and voted on (ranked) by the users.
Wikipedia absurdly declares Hunter Biden laptop scandal a "debunked right-wing conspiracy theory" (naturalnews.com)
submitted 2 months ago by TREDDITFIRST
view the rest of the comments →
[–] tastelessinvective 0 points 25 points 25 points (+25|-0) 2 months ago
We should use this to invalidate wikipedia. It's undeniably partisan propaganda.
[–] dampkitty 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) 2 months ago
It would be nice to reference the interference from wiki editors when the evidence is proven
[–] StBlops2cel_is_Lord 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) 2 months ago
There is Conservapedia https://conservapedia.com/Main_Page
[–] HoKogan 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) 2 months ago
And Infogalactic.com, but I've always enjoyed some encyclopediadramatica
[–] RandomFurryDude 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) 2 months ago
There's also metapedia.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] tastelessinvective 0 points 25 points 25 points (+25|-0) ago
We should use this to invalidate wikipedia. It's undeniably partisan propaganda.
[–] dampkitty 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
It would be nice to reference the interference from wiki editors when the evidence is proven
[–] StBlops2cel_is_Lord 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
There is Conservapedia https://conservapedia.com/Main_Page
[–] HoKogan 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
And Infogalactic.com, but I've always enjoyed some encyclopediadramatica
[–] RandomFurryDude 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
There's also metapedia.