You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
Because cutting out even more aspects of the total population drowns out how crazy the stat is to begin with. You could easily be turned on doing this when women say “men commit 95% of murders, I guess we should ban all men.” It’s just better to keep it simple with 1350.
[–]Sir_Ebral0 points
0 points
0 points
(+0|-0)
ago
I still don't understand how saying "7%" is worse than saying "13%." If anything, it emphasizes how small a portion of the population is committing the overwhelming majority of violent crimes.
And I doubt it's as low as "50%" of murders.
If you get filtered by a woman saying such a line, that's a reflection of poor preparation, not of the cunt having a valid point.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] Sir_Ebral ago (edited ago)
I don't see how pointing out that it's an even lower percentage of the population is anything but good.
What's your reasoning?
[–] Nukeisrael 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Because cutting out even more aspects of the total population drowns out how crazy the stat is to begin with. You could easily be turned on doing this when women say “men commit 95% of murders, I guess we should ban all men.” It’s just better to keep it simple with 1350.
[–] Sir_Ebral ago
I still don't understand how saying "7%" is worse than saying "13%." If anything, it emphasizes how small a portion of the population is committing the overwhelming majority of violent crimes.
And I doubt it's as low as "50%" of murders.
If you get filtered by a woman saying such a line, that's a reflection of poor preparation, not of the cunt having a valid point.