0
11

[–] step 0 points 11 points (+11|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Another step taken upon the euphemism treadmill.

1
8

[–] ChaoticNeutral 1 points 8 points (+9|-1) ago  (edited ago)

Let's go with "persons who have broken federal law".

0
8

[–] pyres 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

Probably just in time for the saucers to land...

3
-2

[–] Sadistic_Bastard 3 points -2 points (+1|-3) ago 

/v/conspiracy is calling.

0
1

[–] toobaditworks [S] 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

0
7

[–] organicgangbang 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

Cause it would be a goddamn shame if we offended people who cross the border and work illegally. Don't want to hurt their feelings.

0
6

[–] ThatGuyYouDontLike 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

Welcome to California! Where the only thing that's legal is illegal immigration!

0
5

[–] 1Sorry_SOB 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

He still doesn't realize IT'S A COOKBOOK.

0
2

[–] DudeDude 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

I like this one. Saucy!

0
0

[–] lord_nougat 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

0
4

[–] Zaqwert 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Despite the fact "alien" has been a neutral word describing someone originating from another country for centuries.

Of course common sense and accuracy have no use in liberal language.

0
1

[–] BoiseNTheHood 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

But, but, it's mean! We need to rewrite the dictionary with our feels!

0
2

[–] theSoupSmith 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Wouldn't the ban itself end up breaking the law as soon as it was ratified since it itself contains the word they are trying to ban?

0
0

[–] toobaditworks [S] 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Haha.

load more comments ▼ (4 remaining)