You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
[–]weezkitty0 points
4 points
4 points
(+4|-0)
ago
Well technically Mike Brown didn't shoot. But he did try to grab the officers gun.
Protesting it at the time is one thing, but it is really dumb to protest it a year later.
That is just making up excuses to destroy stuff and steal
A group of undercover officers, who were tailing him.
I'm frankly as suspicious of this narrative as I am of the Boston killing a few months back.
Who are these undercover cops? Why are they in groups of four? Why did they break cover so the suspect knew who they were? What caused the suspect to start firing?
view the rest of the comments →
[–] weezkitty 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
Well technically Mike Brown didn't shoot. But he did try to grab the officers gun. Protesting it at the time is one thing, but it is really dumb to protest it a year later. That is just making up excuses to destroy stuff and steal
[–] vuke69 1 point 4 points 5 points (+5|-1) ago
I believe he was referring to the one that happened a couple days ago. Some dumbshit fired on a group of officers, with the predictable outcome.
[–] kendamagendale 2 points -1 points 1 point (+1|-2) ago
A group of undercover officers, who were tailing him.
I'm frankly as suspicious of this narrative as I am of the Boston killing a few months back.
Who are these undercover cops? Why are they in groups of four? Why did they break cover so the suspect knew who they were? What caused the suspect to start firing?