You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
3

[–] blackguard19 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Has the test been proven to work?

Has the virus in question been isolated and scientifically proven to cause disease?

No?

So why does anyone waste time talking about statistics that are based on meaningless testing kits that claim to detect a virus that has not been isolated or shown to cause disease?

1
1

[–] DanglingGoatBalls 1 point 1 point (+2|-1) ago  (edited ago)

Has the test been proven to work?

Has the virus in question been isolated and scientifically proven to cause disease?

No?

So why does anyone waste time talking about statistics that are based on meaningless testing kits that claim to detect a virus that has not been isolated or shown to cause disease?

You win the Corona internet today. Talking about statistics as it relates to this "virus" is a no starter because the "virus" has never been isolated and they cooked the books on the numbers so much the stats are meaningless. All we know is that they faked the numbers wayyyy up there.

1
1

[–] blackguard19 1 point 1 point (+2|-1) ago  (edited ago)

People just take for granted that “science has been done” when really just a few misleading papers have been put out there that when read carefully actually admit that they haven’t fulfilled Koch’s postulates for infectious disease agents.

You can’t have a test that tests for something that hasn’t even been biochemically detailed. It shouldn’t surprise anyone that the positive test rate

a. does not rise relative to the number of total tests, and

b. is apparently not correlated to illness whatsoever