1
9

[–] ardvarcus 1 point 9 points (+10|-1) ago 

A mortality rate of 3.4% for the coronavirus is absolutely ridiculous. Anyone with any ability to reason should have known this. But these supposed medical professionals don't reason, they read statistics and just accept them like little sheep. False statistics said 3.4%, so instead of using their fucking brains and common sense, and understanding that this was howling off-the-walll idiotic for a mild flu-like virus, they just accepted it and spread it in the media. Now they have to retract, as other statistics that are a little closer to reality come out. And again, all they are doing it reciting the statistics, without thinking whether they make any sense or not.

0
4

[–] qtm 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

The Diamond Princess, where everyone was tested, had 11 deaths of 700 infected. 1.6% death rate. But there are a lot more old people on cruises. Although they are probably a bit healthier on average.

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2020/03/16/diamond-princess-mysteries/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_coronavirus_pandemic_on_cruise_ships

0
1

[–] BlackGrapeDrank 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

this. and we dont know the medical history of the 11 deaths. wbjxh could easily be due to other factors.

0
4

[–] gazillions 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

It wasn't a mistake. The corporate marxists have been destroying independent small business since the 1980's. It didn't just "work out that way". It's been slow and deliberate, and this is part of putting more small business out of business, and making damned sure nobody but nobody makes a dime they don't get a slice of.

All those global organisations are in service to the one percent, not the fucking globe.

1
3

[–] CognitiveDissident5 1 point 3 points (+4|-1) ago 

Well the test is flawed since it has an 80 percent false positive rate.

1
1

[–] rspix000 1 point 1 point (+2|-1) ago 

The data from ya know, science http://covid19.healthdata.org/

0
1

[–] Harpfor7 [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Ya know your link is projections, not real data.

4
-3

[–] rspix000 4 points -3 points (+1|-4) ago 

You know your statement mixes two parts of the chart? The data is updated at least once per day and the historical numbers are hard data. The future part of the graph is, of course, projections based on modeling that is well understood. Using your title, where is the "faulty data"?

0
0

[–] Drunkenst ago 

Thomas Dolby predicted this.

0
0

[–] CognitiveDissident5 ago 

Or Scientism?

0
0

[–] BitChuteArchive ago 

0
0

[–] petevoat ago 

Hannity is annoying, Tucker has gotten annoying over thr past weeks perpetuating the hoax.

Laura seems to have a more level head.

0
0

[–] BlackGrapeDrank ago 

controlled opposition

0
0

[–] mirror_rorrim ago 

There are balls between her legs but man wish she quit interrupting her guests so much making everything about 'me, me, me' versus 'the story'.

1
3

[–] Nosferatjew 1 point 3 points (+4|-1) ago 

Well, she's a woman. What do expect?

8
-5