You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
10

[–] 22624675? 0 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago 

There’s not enough to go on here to show that sort of legitimate concern justifying censorship of this core political speech.

This is what is now known as "epic" for our side? Christ we are losing.

0
4

[–] watts2db 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

yeah this is a real low threshold for epic

0
1

[–] 22627819? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Yeah, fucking baffled over here.

0
2

[–] J_Darnley 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

I think it was this that was "epic".

The judge stopped Mersereau dead, asking, “So First Amendment protections vary from high school to high school?”

If the judge really did and said that then maybe.

0
3

[–] 22627798? 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

That is still not epic to me. Epic would have been saying something like, "Why the fuck are you even bringing this before a judiciary? If you try it again, I will initiate proceedings to disbar you." That would fall under "epic" for me.

0
0

[–] Drenki ago 

I'm with you. Maybe there is an article about it with a different headline.