0
23

[–] Did_you_voat_for_me 0 points 23 points (+23|-0) ago 

The whole setting is absurd. NSA is like a playground bully who knows he's much bigger than everyone else and doesn't give a fuck about playing by the rules. :O

0
10

[–] BrownMoses 0 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago 

Eventually after pissing enough people off, that playground bully gets knocked in the face & thrown on the ground

0
10

[–] GeminiK 0 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago 

This is a metaphor for armed uprising. Like it or not, the way to stop a bully is to beat the shit out of them.

0
17

[–] zoetry 0 points 17 points (+17|-0) ago  (edited ago)

So can we, uh, defund the NSA, or something?

They're quickly approaching Westboro-Baptist levels of insanity.

0
9

[–] g-j-a 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

OK everyone, pay attention. THIS is how you victim blame.

1
0

[–] Balrogic 1 points 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

For further examples, see most comment threads about the police killing unarmed, unresisting suspects in order to reinforce their petty dominance.

0
2

[–] g-j-a 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Nah, that's thuggery with a Napoleonic complex. The police have fairly well given up bothering with excuses at this point. And from recent news it seems to be spreading out of the US borders. How nice.

0
6

[–] SpecialOfficerDoofy 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

Hasn't Obama openly admitted that it's the fault of the NSA?

0
0

[–] Longtimelurker 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Didn't he advocate transparency while knowing about the surveillance?

0
4

[–] Donbuster 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Sees title That's rich, how did they manage that nonsense reasoning? Disgonbgud.gif

0
5

[–] GeminiK 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Here's how we reached our reasoning. [REDACTED] See it's all there plain as day.

0
3

[–] TerraKell 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Don't get mad, get even. In 1968 I was taking a correspondence course in electronics. One of the lessons dealt with frequency inversion to encrypt voice communication. It was a rudimentary form of voice encryption that the police used on their radios. It used a 3.5kHz oscillator, solid state diodes, and 2 audio transformers if I remember correctly. I would never trust encryption on my phone or computer such as Skype to have no backdoors. Having said all this I have a plan to make evesdropping on telephone conversations very difficult to understand by the person(s) intercepting it.

Microprocessors are cheap. There would be 2 or more devices with the same key that the microprocessor would invert and vary the conversation amplitude and frequency according to the same random number set on both devices. These would be independent of the telephones and 'encrypt' the audio before it gets to the phone and after it leaves the phone. It would sound like the old modem and fax telephone signals because it could be acoustically coupled to and from the phone.

So disposable phones and these devices would ensure private conversations. And frustrate the NSA listeners as well as the computers looking for key words. Beep, beep, bop, and so on.

This same idea could encrypt text messages outside of the phones.

Edit: https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=ring%20modulator%20scrambler

So here are schematics and descriptions for this scrambler.

0
2

[–] rspix000 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Clapper swears it's true!

0
0

[–] ximian 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

NSA is into fulltime trolling

load more comments ▼ (2 remaining)