0
7

[–] PeeNutButtHair 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

Is there any document that gives a deeper explanation of the expulsion for each?

2
5

[–] shiffscreek 2 points 5 points (+7|-2) ago  (edited ago)

deeper explanation

"deeper explanation" ?!?!!?

As the Jews claim quit often : "FOR NO REASON AT ALL"

That is the reason they cite.

"For NO REASON at all"

Over 1,000 times for no reason at all.

citations in here : https://www.docdroid.net/BZHplSm/the-complete-list-of-the-1030-jewish-expulsions-in-human-history.pdf

1
3

[–] PeeNutButtHair 1 point 3 points (+4|-1) ago 

A list alone doesn't allow me to compare each instance to see how it is similar to modern day practices.

0
4

[–] Rotteuxx 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

The sources stated in the document would have to be procured for that, that's a lot of books to look up.

0
0

[–] GoyimNose ago 

The so if jew gets expelled from one country the list is counting the cities / villiages in that country. Also a lot of countries expelled the Jews more than once

0
0

[–] Jabilukka ago 

In the olden days cities were autonomous so tossing them out was specific to that place, that they were tossed of other places in the same country just shows you that they always behave like cunts wherever they are.

0
7

[–] hillaryisanigger 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

maybe someone should kill them in place and stuff instead of expensive and useless transportation

0
7

[–] Inaminit 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

0
4

[–] HeLovedPandas 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

I thought 109 sounded a little low.

0
2

[–] moirai11 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

TBH I think those promoting 109 all over the web are from jewish boot camp centers. Trying to give disinfo. Making it lower and lower.

0
2

[–] Deceneu 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Wasn't it 19 times ?

0
1

[–] foltaisaprovenshill 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

It's "109 countries", but those countries did it multiple times, specifically like 10x each or more (though not evenly distributed). Both numbers are accurate in their own ways.

0
4

[–] VicariousJambi 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

1
6

[–] Tallest_Skil 1 point 6 points (+7|-1) ago 

And a prettier version of it with citations.

0
3

[–] Yogus 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Thank you! Lots of the links in the OP version were broken as well.

0
2

[–] moirai11 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Hot

0
3

[–] anoncastillo 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

1031 incoming

1
3

[–] zxcvzxcv 1 point 3 points (+4|-1) ago 

Can we make it 1,031?

0
2

[–] hillaryisanigger 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

what problem would that fix?

1
1

[–] zxcvzxcv 1 point 1 point (+2|-1) ago 

All of them.

0
2

[–] Adriansun 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

This is very important. Copy and keep it safe, please. Review the notes randomly so we can verify and share our experience.

0
2

[–] anticlutch [S] 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

There's a concerted (((effort))) on voat to claim it's only 109. It's regular and in each instance for months I've linked the 1,030 source.

0
0

[–] Adriansun ago 

I agree. I always find it odd when people say 109 / 359 when we know about this documentation.

0
2

[–] Epsteinsuicidesquad 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

What about the 60 gorillion?

load more comments ▼ (7 remaining)