You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
[+]tonberry20 points1 point1 point
ago
(edited ago)
[–]tonberry20 points
1 point
1 point
(+1|-0)
ago
(edited ago)
They are trying to argue against the belief that bullies are sick people with genetic illnesses and broken pasts. Their argument is that bullies are acting the way they do to improve their rank (or at least their belief that they are already in a higher rank). Anybody who has been bullied in high school usually figures this out about the people that pick on them; bullies are trying to achieve grandeur by demonstrating to themselves that they aren't as lowly as the people they pick on. This idea is what this study concludes as well:
The average bully isn’t particularly sadistic or even deeply argumentative,” he says. “What they really are is people driven for status.”
It's actually a great conclusion because it removes the nonsense conclusion that bullies aren't reponsible for their behavior because of poor genetics or what have you. They are choosing to be a-holes for personal gain.
This was how I read it as well. I think some people are more looking at the title as a "no duh" or a an excuse of perceived negative behavior. The real point is this underlying rationale that can be teased out.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] tonberry2 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
They are trying to argue against the belief that bullies are sick people with genetic illnesses and broken pasts. Their argument is that bullies are acting the way they do to improve their rank (or at least their belief that they are already in a higher rank). Anybody who has been bullied in high school usually figures this out about the people that pick on them; bullies are trying to achieve grandeur by demonstrating to themselves that they aren't as lowly as the people they pick on. This idea is what this study concludes as well:
It's actually a great conclusion because it removes the nonsense conclusion that bullies aren't reponsible for their behavior because of poor genetics or what have you. They are choosing to be a-holes for personal gain.
[–] bill.lee ago
This was how I read it as well. I think some people are more looking at the title as a "no duh" or a an excuse of perceived negative behavior. The real point is this underlying rationale that can be teased out.