You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

3
3

[–] WORF_MOTORBOATS_TROI 3 points 3 points (+6|-3) ago  (edited ago)

The article doesn't mention any of those sites, only discord. Why do Q tards think it's ok to lie in a headline to whore for more upvotes?

1
2

[–] urp [S] 1 point 2 points (+3|-1) ago  (edited ago)

They start with the one that they have the most chat logs from discovery on, then come after the rest using same CIVIL SUIT TACTIC.

If state supreme court does not intervene, this civil lawsuit tactic crap will try to crush players like voat eventually.

This jew tactic is similar to famed SLAPP : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strategic_lawsuit_against_public_participation

3
-1

[–] WORF_MOTORBOATS_TROI 3 points -1 points (+2|-3) ago 

You're not on a Q sub where sperging out about shit that I don't need to have explained to me will get you a pass for being a liar and an attention whore.

1
1

[–] urp [S] 1 point 1 point (+2|-1) ago 

Its to go after all using SAME TACTIC. They just need to finish harvesting "evidence"

Its for shutting down all using CIVIL COURTS because criminal courts have no effect on free speech sites.

0
1

[–] WORF_MOTORBOATS_TROI 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

You told a bald faced lie to whore for attention. That is not the same as pointing out the potential ramifications for other free-speech websites if that lawsuit is successful.