You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
The other four companies should refuse to cover for them. Not for residential fires, but anything commercial and township owned or any homes owned by the leaders of that town.
I think they're more like independant firehouses than completely separate services with separate jurisdictions. But yes, if the remaining companies refused to cover the councillors anymore that'd definitely send a message.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] klobos 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
The other four companies should refuse to cover for them. Not for residential fires, but anything commercial and township owned or any homes owned by the leaders of that town.
[–] Broc_Lia 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
I think they're more like independant firehouses than completely separate services with separate jurisdictions. But yes, if the remaining companies refused to cover the councillors anymore that'd definitely send a message.