You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
61

[–] downton-stabby 0 points 61 points (+61|-0) ago 

Hate speech is protected speech. No one cares about approved speech.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 19 points (+19|-0) ago  (edited ago)

[Deleted]

0
7

[–] d33t 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago  (edited ago)

The use of the word "platforms" suggests that, although the US did not commit to this provision on the government level, social media platforms have committed on the private level.

0
3

[–] u_r_wat_u_eat 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

How is this crook even still in office? Are the French yellow vests really that fucking useless? They've been protesting for like 40 weeks and still can't get that jew loving faggot kicked out..?

0
0

[–] 20346720? ago 

Expanding the definition of slander/libel to include unjust defamation of a group of people would help. For example, the rhetoric common to the 6 media corps causes real harm to the property (safety, employability, stable prices of goods and services, ...) of white people.

Take everything they have earned from it, give it to the people who were defamed (if only a class action didn't go straight to lawyers).