1
303

[–] Donald_Trump 1 points 303 points (+304|-1) ago 

0
18

[–] 12311986 0 points 18 points (+18|-0) ago 

Thank you! Now if only we can upvoat you to the top comment.

1
12

[–] Bkow 1 points 12 points (+13|-1) ago 

I'm trying yet I only have one upvoat.

3
8

[–] crysys 3 points 8 points (+11|-3) ago 

Upon further review, I'm sorry. I can't bring myself to vote for Donald Trump. Not even in this way.

0
2

[–] Skwerley 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Too bad the comments above are full of stupid fucking jokes! Everyone should keep telling me I'm being cynical when I say we should report those though

0
9

[–] AtheistComic 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

Thanks Donald! I'd vote for you only to see if Idiocracy becomes real!

0
2

[–] officer_dick_nipples 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Well, coming from you...

0
2

[–] Donald_Trump 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

I've made my positions very clear. Also, Chaparino is currently paying off his debts to me by hitting the campaign trail

 

Join me here if you have any questions!

0
1

[–] akuta 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Nice try, Donald. Just trying to put off the rumor mill, but you could totally use this for publicity for that Presidential campaign. ;)

9
262

[–] senpaithatignoresyou 9 points 262 points (+271|-9) ago  (edited ago)

I can see trump countering this, by offering double the reward for el chapo. If he does that, its over, i will vote trump, then learn to play the violin as the country and world burns around me.

0
153

[–] fricknmaniac 0 points 153 points (+153|-0) ago 

Trump would never do that.

Because bringing El Chapo to Trump would mean bringing another illegal immigrant into America.

[–] [deleted] 1 points 40 points (+41|-1) ago 

[Deleted]

3
6

[–] AdlfJmal 3 points 6 points (+9|-3) ago 

My sides.

0
3

[–] Gargilius 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Besides, I'd trust El Chapo to pay the bounty more than I'd trust Trump...

0
2

[–] meatflop 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Trump doesn't have that much money anyway.

[–] [deleted] 5 points 17 points (+22|-5) ago 

[Deleted]

1
29

[–] postmordum 1 points 29 points (+30|-1) ago 

should be, but remember, he's rich, so it would be the biggest classiest prison.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 19 points (+19|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
1

[–] AtheistComic 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Actually El Chapo is a fugitive and Trump could double the reward for his bounty capture (which is legal).

0
1

[–] CommonSense 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Why should he? Isn't it self defense?

0
4

[–] Donald_Trump 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Nope, I can do better than put a bounty on his head- I'm going to make him switch sides

0
2

[–] stpete 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

[–] [deleted] 0 points 97 points (+97|-0) ago  (edited ago)

[Deleted]

5
99

[–] mcseanerson 5 points 99 points (+104|-5) ago 

So Trump says all Mexico does is send criminals here and a Mexican criminal is so offended he puts a hit out on him.

He's kind of proving Trumps point.

0
28

[–] Detry 0 points 28 points (+28|-0) ago  (edited ago)

This would be a classroom example of Machiavellianism

"The employment of cunning and duplicity in statecraft or in general conduct"

Donald Trump and El Chapo have one thing in common, keeping the status quo. If things change then it might be harder for them to "operate".

Actually solving immigration and drug policy would hurt both of them.

3
27

[–] OmicronPersei8 3 points 27 points (+30|-3) ago 

Last time I checked crossing the border illegally is a crime. No, they're not all rapists and murderers, but they're all criminals.

0
1

[–] hell_yeah 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

He'll just pay a white guy to do the job.

4
6

[–] 1Sorry_SOB 4 points 6 points (+10|-4) ago 

Yep.

0
5

[–] SilverBanana 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

He can do nothing better to support him. He confirms the argument Trump is using to win!

5
46

[–] Bkow 5 points 46 points (+51|-5) ago 

My favorite comment at the bottom is from a black woman, "This land belongs to the Native Americans."

16
34

[–] UlfuricAcid 16 points 34 points (+50|-16) ago 

Well... she's not wrong.

4
58

[–] wolfsktaag 4 points 58 points (+62|-4) ago 

in that vein, who does great britain belong to? celts? saxons? romans?

it belongs to modern day brits. murica doesnt belong to natives

27
30

[–] carlip 27 points 30 points (+57|-27) ago 

she is wrong. the whole reason that they were so easy to "steal" from is because they didn't have a sense of ownership over land. When asked, "is this your land", the natives replied, "no". So the white man assumed it was up for grabs.

0
3

[–] SilverBanana 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Ehhh, almost no people are "originaly" from some place. How long before it belongs to modern imigrants? People living in modern Greece are not original inhabitants, id does not mean the land "does not belong to them."

0
1

[–] SpaceRosa 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

I was taught in History that the natives didn't believe in owning land.

1
12

[–] toobaditworks 1 points 12 points (+13|-1) ago  (edited ago)

Same people say the 'South lost the war so take down the flag'. Well guess what the Indians also lost the war. This land belongs to whoever can hold on to it. Kinda like your mom. Sorry..

0
4

[–] Bkow 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

We are essentially King of the Hill champs.

0
3

[–] WildThingSammiT 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

I have claimed Pluto as my own. Pluto belongs to me. If someone were to colonize it, we fought, and I lost, Pluto would no longer belong to me, correct?

0
1

[–] rheiser 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Won't someone think of the Pangeans?!

0
1

[–] BigAl265 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Those comments gave me cancer, it's scary just how stupid people can be.

0
0

[–] Bkow 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Stupid is as stupid does.

3
25

[–] 1Sorry_SOB 3 points 25 points (+28|-3) ago 

It kind of puts Obama on the spot. You can't have bounties put on the head of presidential candidates by citizens of friendly countries. He has to put pressure on the Mexican government to address this. Reagan would have sent in the Marines. I don't expect too much from Obama though.

0
15

[–] redikulous 0 points 15 points (+15|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Reagan would have sent in the Marines

HA! Like that'll work

0
19

[–] Lord_Shitlord 0 points 19 points (+19|-0) ago 

Worked in Beiru.. oh yeah.

3
4

[–] 1Sorry_SOB 3 points 4 points (+7|-3) ago 

I'm just saying Reagan would have. I don't take this guy seriously.

But if there was a will on the part of the US to nullify this threat from El Chapo, I have no doubt it could be done in a day or 2. I bet the US knows exactly where he is.

0
6

[–] bill.lee 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

It might be far more simpler if action was derived from some monarch dictating action as opposed to the vast bureaucracy. Various governmental agencies are already after El Chapo and the US government already tried to have him extradited. That's probably what spurred the rationale for his escape plan. So, the pressure has been applied. As to what Reagan would have done? He didn't even send the Marines into Tripoli...he just bombed the hell out of it. He didn't invade Central America, he just supported dissidents. In my opinion, Obama makes Reagan look quite the dove.

0
11

[–] armday2day 0 points 11 points (+11|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Interestingly (and maybe contradictorily) enough in the libertarian/anarcho-capitalist areas of the internet there are some interesting articles/essays that examine the role a Monarch and the relation to general freedom. The contradiction here is that these essays usually favor a Monarch in comparison to the modern corporatist oligarchies. Essentially the benefits in regards to freedom stem from likely backlash a Monarch would face if they were to impose harsh regulations and penalties. The modern state hides its actions behind the concept of Democracy. When the populace is convinced that the current state of affairs is their own doing they are less likely to rebel.

In addition many monarchies claim/claimed the land that they rule to be their property. There exists an interest to preserve the strength of a nation if the ruler is to reign for life. Temporary representatives have a much higher incentive to trade their votes and clout for payment.

I do not personally support the concept of a monarch, but I did find the related articles interesting. I would be happy to link you to some reading material but I can't find the articles at the moment.

0
3

[–] MrNPC 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

And JFK would have sent in a Black Ops team. The Mexican government failed to contain him twice, they're not gonna get another shot.

0
1

[–] cobeast 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

I know right? Thank God Reagan isn't in the White House now!

1
18

[–] rothx 1 points 18 points (+19|-1) ago  (edited ago)

$100 Million US or MXN?

[–] [deleted] 2 points 53 points (+55|-2) ago 

[Deleted]

0
21

[–] 1Sorry_SOB 0 points 21 points (+21|-0) ago 

But you get your yard tended for life.

0
5

[–] Molo66 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago  (edited ago)

I remember when a Peso was worth more than 10 cents USD.

0
1

[–] Ah_Pook 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

It's funny, because it's more than the bounty on El Chapo.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago  (edited ago)

[Deleted]

0
3

[–] localbum 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

"I committed International Assassinations for the world's most feared drug kingpin, and all I got was this lousy t-shirt."

Back says "...and buried alive. Put me back, please."

1
14

[–] Donald_Trump 1 points 14 points (+15|-1) ago 

0
3

[–] 1Sorry_SOB 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

I laughed

[–] [deleted] 5 points 12 points (+17|-5) ago 

[Deleted]

0
9

[–] qiezidaifu 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

When the US wants to assassinate people it finds no trouble in doing so. If they found that it was worth it, they surely would and could.

0
0

[–] Wolfs_claw 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Indeed. If the CIA can find Osama Bin Laden hiding out in a modest house under the protection of Pakistani generals, I'm pretty sure they can find Chapo living it up in his mansion.

1
5

[–] kirkis 1 points 5 points (+6|-1) ago  (edited ago)

No, you're not delusional. America never sold cocaine in the 80's. We never supported Narco terrorist in Latin America.

load more comments ▼ (78 remaining)