[–] Cronenberg 4 points 74 points (+78|-4) ago 

Different species. negroids, asians, and caucasians are completely separate races. We retain the ability to interbreed, but many other so called different species such as dogs and wolves are able to interbreed and produce fertile offspring. The common myth of 'interbreeding produces infertile offspring' has prevented the public from realizing that 'racial' differences are actually a division of species.

[–] vastrightwing 3 points 26 points (+29|-3) ago 

No, you have it all wrong. Everyone is the same. The confusion is that unlike normal animals that have multiple species and sub species. Humans are magical creatures where even when they look completely different physically, they are exactly the same: no difference.

We all share the exact same intelligence, the same thoughts, the same hormone makeup. The fact that some humans may have different noses, color skin, eyes, hair, height, weight, head shape, dispositions, violent tendencies, etc. are all completely inconsequential.

You need to overlook all physical traits and perceived mental abilities and believe we are all the same.

Well, I take it back: jews is the one group that is special. I just can't explain that nose.

[–] SexMachine 0 points 12 points (+12|-0) ago 

Goats can't read sarcasm.

[–] Dots1024 1 point 3 points (+4|-1) ago 

The fact that there really are people who think like this makes the sarcasm even funnier.

'WE'RE ALL THE SAME! Except for jews, of course. They're god's chosen people, with IQs in the 6 gorillions.'

[–] Beast-mode-freak [S] 1 point 11 points (+12|-1) ago 


[–] yob 2 points 25 points (+27|-2) ago  (edited ago)

agreed. Negroes are not human.

The modern definition of Species (not subspecies but ACTUAL species) used for land animals is a DNA divergence of 120,000 years ago or more, this created the different actual SPECIES classifications for wolves, bears, and gorillas. (yes SPECIES of similar looking gorillas not subspecies).

Wolves, bears, and gorillas can freely interbreed, and do, but importantly , the hybrid progeny is fertile and can interbreed further, just like humans can fuck Negroids and create fertile hell-spawn.

DNA! Why do I say Negroes are not human? Because Science says so. A00a-L1149 (or A00a1) Y DNA is 350,000 years old in many Negroes. 9 LIVING CAVEMEN with ACTUAL NEGROID HOMO ERECTUS Y DNA INACT found in CAMEROON, and a camaroon negro found in USA with caveman DNA from 300,000 years ago completely unrelated to real humans ! :


NIGGERS ARE NOT HUMAN according to DNA science and according to definition of species.

Humans were called "Human" (Homo Sapiens sapiens) long before interbreeding with Denisovans, Neanderthals, Homo naledi and Homo floresiensis, but after breeding with "negroid subhumans" like Homo heidelbergensis and Homo sapiens idaltu.

But definition Homo Sapiens sapiens does not allow for the 538 known IQ bestowing genes that Negroes lack, all humans, real humans, are "Homo Sapiens sapiens" mixed with a large amount of Neanderthal DNA.

I propose a new classification for the two SPECIES (not subspecies but SPECIES) of proven existing humans (Blacks vs All other races) of : Homo Sapiens sapiens, and Homo Negroidchud abominatia

[–] 3n0b 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

Where does the spanish/mexican people come from? Are they the product of two species?

[–] Keefin 1 point 14 points (+15|-1) ago  (edited ago)

Great question. Most are ancestors of Beringians. These were related to Asians who crossed the Bering straight. Incidentally, modern East Asians are fairly closely related to Europeans, miles apart from sub-Saharans.

But back to the Beringians. There is good evidence, in my opinion, that they were not the first in the America’s. The first were probably Europeans, known as the Solutreans. And I happen to think that there was civilization in the Americas far before even that, but I can only speculate and that is a deep rabbit hole. I think most of the Europeans were eventually absorbed by the Beringians, who came in greater numbers. But we still see their genetic traces, especially regarding the X maternal haplogroup. Then of course the Spanish and Portuguese came, which is used to explain away all the R1b Y-haplogroup that we see. But personally, I think it’s impossible for them to have left such a strong genetic footprint so quickly.

[–] yob 2 points 6 points (+8|-2) ago  (edited ago)

No. But their native-American mestizo DNA, is less intelligent than europeans, provably via gene sequencing, and of course, IQ tests.

MESTIZOs are half european (or far less) DNA mixed with native blood from North , Middle or South America : These faces :


Those are photos, but computers that blend 1000 photos from a location on earth create valuable synthetic AVERAGE FACES OF RACES. Genetic "race" shows up in skull shapes, nose, skin.

Look at these AVERAGE RACE FACES! :


Female world "races" (thousands of computer composited photos) :


Other news info on Female world "races" (thousands of computer composited photos) :


There are many many science papers that track the Y DNA (father lineage), and egg cell Mitochondrial DNA

Human Y-chromosome haplogroup DNA races :


races prior to 1500 :


Mitochondrial DNA races :


Al humans on earth EXCEPT BLACKS originated from what we term "Homo Sapiens sapiens" that interbred with Neanderthals and retained 2 to 6% of their DNA trapped in our DNA. Even Asians got this nordic DNA by breeding with Denisovans who already mixed with Neanderthal DNA.

This Neanderthal DNA we took is birth canal width and length, cranium size, frontal lobe brain planning genes, but most of all and most critically, brain surface folding genes for much higher IQ.

Humans spread back and forth (yes back and forth), again and again, all over the world, soon after getting these IQ genes taken from Neanderthals. The original ancient peoples of Pacific and South America may have been MORE CLEVER and SMARTER 1000 years ago, but bred dumber over time because no need for longrange winter planning, no large city states with specialized trades and education (merchant classifications), and too much free tropical food to forage breed lazy subsistence over the milleniums. They of course domesticated animals, bred plant crop species, and developed astronomy, but over time the south amricans (Inca Maya Aztec and Olmec) got stuck in non-development. No evolutionary pressure to force brain IQ evolution. No harsh winters to plan on.

How low did "Hispanic" brain development stay stuck at? Pretty low, but not as low as Blacks in africa.

TL;DR : Not a "Social Construct". RACE IS VISIBLE ON A FACE and in Y DNA and in Egg Cell DNA. Though all true existing humans (except west africans) are "Homos Sapiens sapiens") [note the extra sapiens] and have some Neanderthal IQ genes.

[–] Lynch_Tree 1 point 6 points (+7|-1) ago  (edited ago)

Yes. Mesitzos (the vast majority of Latin America) are mutts with European and native shitskin blood. All attractive Latina's are mostly, if not all, genetically European.

The conquistadors really liked rape and made the settlers up north look like a bunch of pussies.

[–] Tallest_Skil 1 point 5 points (+6|-1) ago 


They’re white, for fuck’s sake.


All of Latin America is a bunch of fucking half-breeds between Homo europeansis and Homo americanis at this point.

[–] MDEneverdies1488 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Had an argument if a similar vein with a biology major some months ago. He held onto the definition of species as being fertile offspring. After I told him about second generation grolar bears (polar and grizzly offspring) he couldn't comprehend and defaulted to "you're a racist piece of shit." Known this guy since high school lol. Good times

[–] beesmeesmonies 3 points 14 points (+17|-3) ago 

it's no surprise that everything "official" is currently a dirty-yiddish-gypsy lie!!!

[–] yob 1 point 10 points (+11|-1) ago 


"a dirty-yiddish-gypsy lie"

Why lie? Because the evidence for three decades and now backed up with FULL SEQUENCED DNA of Denisovian, Nenderthal, early Homo Sapiens sapiens, all prove that the JEWISH CONTROLLED COLLEGE TEXTBOOKS keep clinging to now proven LIES.

The Lies now are beyond even mildly supportable by the hard evidence, by the (((myth spinners))) shilling this "Out of Africa" nonsense, and "We Were All Negroes in the Past" nonsense.

Science has proven many times that Blacks are VERY non human

Of the 538 genes for above 100 IQ intelligence, west african Negroes and Australian aborigines LACK most of the smart genes!

Look at bottom of this list of IQ from composited science paper research :


Sri Lanka - 79 IQ !!!
Zambia - 79
Democratic Republic of the Congo - 78
Nepal - 78
Qatar - 78
Comoros - 77
South Africa - 77
Cape Verde - 76
Congo - 76
Mauritania - 76
Senegal - 76
Mali - 74
Namibia - 74
Ghana - 73
Tanzania - 72
Central African Republic - 71
Jamaica - 71
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines - 71
Sudan - 71
Antigua and Barbuda - 70
Benin - 70
Botswana - 70
Rwanda - 70
Togo - 70
Burundi - 69
Cote d'Ivoire - 69
Ethiopia - 69
Malawi - 69
Niger - 69
Angola - 68
Burkina Faso - 68
Chad - 68
Djibouti - 68
Somalia - 68
Swaziland - 68
Dominica - 67
Guinea - 67
Guinea-Bissau - 67
Haiti - 67
Lesotho - 67
Liberia - 67
Saint Kitts and Nevis - 67
Sao Tome and Principe - 67
The Gambia - 66
Cameroon - 64
Gabon - 64
Mozambique - 64
Saint Lucia - 62
Equatorial Guinea - 59 IQ !!!

The smartest countries all have the least brown or black skins.

The problem is that ALL humans on earth except blacks have brain folding genes from RECENT cross breeding with NEANDERTHALS (yes even everyone in south america), and the asians have these genes by breeding with DENISOVIANS (who also had bred earlier with NEANDERTHALS). And the SMARTEST asians bred at two points in history with DENISOVIANS, while the water-niggers and Thais only interbred one time.

Modern asian humans (smart non-Thai asians) interbred with Denisovans TWICE in history :


Some smarter asians picked up DNA, just as whites did, by breeding with Neanderthal&Denisovian half-breeds from conquering Neanderthal males... with full actual DNA sequenced from actual half-breed Denisovian+Neanderthal breeding bone fragment example ! :


GENES 80% Predict your IQ!!!

538 genes that are thought to be linked to intelligence (by comparing 300,000 test subjects) :


The percentage of Neanderthal DNA in modern black humans is zero !!! (they interbred 300,000 to 185,000 years ago with a ape-like hominid, probably a version of Homo heidelbergensis branch):


9 LIVING CAVEMEN with ACTUAL NEGROID HOMO ERECTUS Y DNA INACT found in CAMEROON, and a camaroon negro found in USA with caveman DNA from 300,000 years ago completely unrelated to real humans ! :


A00a-L1149 (or A00a1) Y DNA is 350,000 years old in many Negroes. Negroes DO NOT have common ancestor human Y DNA nicknamed "Y-chromosomal Adam" but they keep changing the definition every 5 years, to not let Negores feel bad :


US Gov scientists agree that some Negroes discovered to be non-human, and Negroes interbred with ape-like creatures long long ago :


Shocking quotes from PMC4947341 "Hominin interbreeding and the evolution of human variation":

one-fifth of the Neanderthal genome may lurk within modern humans... (but totally absent in Negroes)

SUBHUMAN! interbreeding between Sub-Saharan Africans and an as-yet-unknown hominin, such as H. heidelbergensis...


Some think that the Negroes that bred with H. heidelbergensis were "Homo sapiens idaltu", and that "Homo sapiens idaltu" thus evolved into Negroes, while actual humans descended from 'Homo sapiens idaltu' leaving africa and interbreeding with Denisovian+Neanderthal becoming real humans , now called "Homo Sapiens sapiens) [note the extra sapiens].

Some Russian and Chinese scientists currently denounce that and say its the opposite, and that 'Homo sapiens idaltu' ENTERED africa and interbred with the indigenous Negroes (H. heidelbergensis).

Homo erectus went extinct only 50,000 years ago (100,000 tops) and was provably low IQ and PROVEN LAZY, similar to current Blacks, but unknown how much DNA admixture of Homo erectus is in the modern negro, if any, due to heat damage of artifact DNA, Negroes diverged from all real humans 350,000 years ago, as proven and mentioned frequently already (current Negro Y-DNA A00a-L1149 is 350,000 years old!).

Laziness in Homo erectus proof YES LAZY BLACKS! :


NOT JUST LAZY hominids, but LOW IQ, lazy Blacks never invented any crops, domesticated animals, or even the WHEEL!

Whites & Blacks 100 FACTS! Blacks never invented the wheel!:

Even though Blacks are now proven from over 350,000 years ago, vs real Humans nowadays, There were MANY types of Hominids that looked like humans, right up until each were killed off and replaced by Modern Humans.

No matter how you organize the timeline, DNA does not lie. Blacks are an unrelated species. Most land mammals are radically different species after 120,000 year separation, and Blacks separated from all real humans 350,000 years ago.

Gorillas : Scientists claim at least two branches of gorillas ARE DIFFERENT SPECIES (over 120,000 years apart), yet gorillas have far more DNA in common as a percent to each gorilla species than ANY Negro on earth has to ANY Non-negro !!! Negroes ARE A DIFFERENT SPECIES according to scientific logic, and not Homo Sapiens at all!


TL/DR : Negroes are NOT Human. Y DNA from a handful of talking apes in Cameroon PROVE that Negros are not HUMAN and Negros share few genes with all other races, and are almost closer to chimps, than the dna "distance" between two of the main species of identical looking gorilla species!

[–] Beast-mode-freak [S] 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

Nice post bro, agreed. t- PhD in STEM here.

[–] ChaosCrusader 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago  (edited ago)

I love how you are all over this thread sowing your knowledge.

[–] ardvarcus 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Some Russian and Chinese scientists currently denounce that and say its the opposite, and that 'Homo sapiens idaltu' ENTERED africa and interbred with the indigenous Negroes (H. heidelbergensis).

I'm leaning toward this view. Thank you for this information, by the way. It is helpful in understanding the reality of human evolution. One of the biggest scandals in all of science is the way the truth about human evolution, and the place of the Negro in human evolution, has been covered up and hidden since the 19th century.

[–] Jaegerjaques ago 

Can you recommend any good books on this topic?

[–] Beast-mode-freak [S] 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Oy vey! The goyim know, shut it down!!!

[–] ardvarcus 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

The man-made global warming fraud was the eye-opener. If modern "science" can be so far off the bubble on this topic, how far off is it on the question of human origins?

[–] beesmeesmonies 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

everything "official" is currently a dirty-yiddish-gypsy lie!!!

[–] One-Way_Bus 2 points 2 points (+4|-2) ago 

What's up street shitter?

[–] tokui 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

They found 6 million yr old human foot prints in Greece. Put that in your pipe, fucking Africafags.

[–] Beast-mode-freak [S] 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

They were "bipedal hominids" that had human like gaits. Unfortunately, there is no proof they were actually human, but at this rate, who knows maybe they were but we can't say for sure.

[–] yob 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

NOPE. BONES EXIST TOO! They were our human ancestors. Its too mathematically impossible to have unrelated multiply independent hominids evolve and not have at least one common ancestor. No other mammal in history did so.

It means that humans DEVELOPED OUTSIDE AFRICA , such as Greece) then eventually entered Africa and bred with other african talking apes, but that mankind did not come FROM africa.

GREECE : New fossils suggest human ancestors evolved in Europe, not Africa :

First Human Ancestor Came from Europe Not Africa, 7.2 Million-year-old Fossils Indicate :

Europe was the birthplace of mankind, not Africa, scientists find :

Scientists Look To Europe As Evolutionary Seat : Found in Germany 20 years ago, this specimen is about 16.5 million years old:

TL;DR: Humans originated outside Africa according to modern science papers, Russian Scientists, and Chinese Scientists.

[–] Goering 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Specfically, a hallux, correct?

[–] tokui 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago  (edited ago)

More than that. Even apes have a big toe, but theirs is splayed to the side. These are forward and stick past the other toes. It's a very "human" foot. And older than ANYTHING in Africa. At that time in africa, the hominids were very much apes. Even "Lucy" skeleton was altered to make it appear more human.


[–] Beast-mode-freak [S] 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

These are the third oldest Homo sapiens, modern human remains in the world. The second oldest is the Dali man in China 210-260k years old, and the oldest is Jebel Irhoud in Morocco at around 300k years old. I cannot wait for the next "oldest modern humans"to be found, and where. As technology advances, old lies that formed/justified the popular narrative that has been fed to us for decades, are proven to be false.

[–] Gumbatron 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

Much archaeology lies under the ~200 feet of water that recedes during periods of glaciation (Ice Ages) which have been the norm for most of the climate history that we have any records for (around 800,000 years for ice cores). What lies off the cost of England/Europe (Doggerland), what lies off the cost of Japan and India. Would be interesting to find out.

[–] yob 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Midden piles.

Humans living along coasts like to put all their used seashells in mammoth huge midden piles.

Thousands have been found, some under the sea for a long time, many never under sea but now a mile from the new further shoreline.

Middens prove existence of Humanoids and brain function, and a perverse sense of community working together to make the shell pile gigantic and singular.


I mention this because you asked "What lies off the cost of England/Europe" ?

The answer if it was prior land above waterline and less than 130,000 years ago... is MIDDENS

MIDDENS are beneath the sea. Also all over the world near ancient large freshwater lakes and rivers.

No one knows why societies build huge middens that span generations of mollusk consumption.

[–] geovoat 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

They found a massive city deep in the water off if India's west coast.

[–] Beast-mode-freak [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

I suspect there is a lot of interesting stuff in Antarctica under ice.

[–] 22trilionAsecond 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

I want to know more about the global civilization of white people who live 12,000 years ago. They were at least more advanced than the Romans. Some one cut, moved and lifted those 800+ tone stones used to build the foundation of the heliopolis baalbek. It sure as hell wasn't the Romans. The best roman crane could lift 6 tones. those 800 tone stone are 30+feet of the ground.

There are MANY MANY more things like this all over the place. What were those people like.

[–] geovoat 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Watch Brien Forster YouTube channel.

He documents all the megalithic structures in most areas. The theory is a group who survived the flood caused by a meteor impact on the ice sheet 12,000 ago traveled to all parts of the world reseeding advanced architecture and astrology and boat building. They had red hair and came in "boats they paddled thenmselves"

They also had elongated skills with a different number of skull sutures. Their red headed skulls are well preserved in Peru. Natives wanted to look smart so began the practice of shaping thier own skills with boards.

They started egypt Too. Hence the royal crown of upper Egypt fits an elongated skull.

They likely were remnants of a preflood land that gave rise to the Atlantis story.

Additional they used a type of concrete used in the pyramids called geopolymer. Which has been recreated by a Greek scientist and he has built small pyramids with it. This is on a YouTube video. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=znQk_yBHre4 The limestone blocks when sent to labs were indistinguishable by the labs. He also found the formula on a inscription on a rock in Egypt after recreating it chemically.

That same scientist showed that south American megaliths were loose stones softened by addition of corn vinegar. They were placed and rehardened with the addition of bird shit. He has recreated this as well. This is why the old stone walls on south America fit so tightly together.

[–] HaHawk ago 

[–] Beast-mode-freak [S] ago 

As do I.

[–] black_poop 1 point 2 points (+3|-1) ago  (edited ago)

did you miss the news? we discover older and older remains every other year, most of the older finds used to be only a single bone or human tooth unearthed, i read about 5 year ago, they actually found a complete human in present day germany that predates everything else seen before.

the niggers always sweep this stuff under the rug, as they are further drifting into irrelevance.

[–] ardvarcus 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

the (((niggers))) always sweep this stuff under the rug

[–] sweetholymosiah ago 

How so. What popular narrative are you referring to? I have to assume the out of Africa hypothesis, which relies on human ancestor species dating back millions of years. This find in Greece has no impact on the evolution of human ancestry, however it certainly redefines our more recent "ancient" history.

[–] yob 1 point 5 points (+6|-1) ago 


Note that the "Out of Africa" theory is now UNSUPPORTED by any fossil evidence!

All RACES except blacks clearly originated OUTSIDE AFIRCA

GREECE : New fossils suggest human ancestors evolved in Europe, not Africa :

First Human Ancestor Came from Europe Not Africa, 7.2 Million-year-old Fossils Indicate :

Europe was the birthplace of mankind, not Africa, scientists find :

Scientists Look To Europe As Evolutionary Seat : Found in Germany 20 years ago, this specimen is about 16.5 million years old:

MODERN species and sub species proposed names of various Homo shit-skins (detailed but lacking DNA refs) :


And of course... Neanderthal genes (lacking in Negros) contributes much of the known 538 genes for higher IQ.

Goddamn textbooks keep shilling the lie that humans descended from Negros, despit the very pesky DNA sequence fact of A00a-L1149 (or A00a1) Y DNA, which is 350,000 years old in many Negroes.

TL;DR: No Humans (Homo Sapiens sapiens) descended from Blacks in Africa.

[–] ShinyVoater 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Europe was the birthplace of mankind, not Africa, scientists find :

Yet if you read the article, it's so far back it has no effect on where even archaic humans come from. Anything pre-Homo is just trivia as far as this sort of statement is concerned.

[–] yob 1 point 1 point (+2|-1) ago  (edited ago)


Only trust DNA from Nature Journals. Not jew laden :out of africa: pop science filtering.

NO, DNA lineage is not "trivia". DNA lineage is the mechanism of evolution and it now shows that negores are NOT a common ancestor to all real humans, and infact they are a subspecies at best, and in fact because they diverged over 350,000 years ago from humans that ENTERED AFRICA, Negroes are a different SPECIES, not mere different subspecies.

Why? DNA again... Science say 120,000 years of DNA separation defines different SPECIES not subspecies of bear, gorilla, and wolf.

Man clearly developed outside of africa and entered africa 350,000 years ago breeding with other ancient hominids there, after taking DNA from east asia first (molar proof), and taking DNA from southern europe (no neanderthal).

[–] Beast-mode-freak [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 


[–] voatusernamevoat 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago  (edited ago)

out of africa

Still clinging to this, soiling this latest find with this debunked theory.


[–] 22trilionAsecond 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

You mean to say that in fact We wuz not niggers

[–] yob ago 

[–] PraiseIPU ago  (edited ago)

Klyosov, A---In 2008 he began publishing work about what he calls "DNA genealogy" that has been dismissed as pseudoscience.

He is an agent of russia pushing "russia invented everything" propaganda. Funny how as soon as he left Russia he hasnt published anything even remotely in that field.

So good job at being a dipshit.


[–] voatusernamevoat 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Not an invention, so good job at being a dipshit.

[–] HenryCabotLodge 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

We was Kangz. In Grease. :)

[–] Beast-mode-freak [S] 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

Are you a nigger? That is such a retarded thing to say, considering this has just been proven, unlike "We wuz kangz!" from Africans when they refer to Egypt, Tunisia, Morocco, Libya etc.

[–] HenryCabotLodge 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

"There is zero Negro - SubSaharan DNA in ancient Egypt : Ancient Egyptians were more white than modern Egyptians who are basically Arabs.Ancient Egyptians were not black and not white also. These people belonged to semitic family and today's jordanian Arabs are the closest modern relatives." I was making "fun" of the "we were Kanz crowd".

[–] 313337 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

I call bullshit on this. They don't explain why these bones are supposedly that old.

According to wikipedia, radiocarbon dating is generally limited to dating samples no more than 50,000 years old, as samples older than that have insufficient 14 C to be measurable.

Older dates have been obtained by using special sample preparation techniques, large samples, and very long measurement times. These techniques can allow measurement of dates up to 60,000 and in some cases up to 75,000 years before the present.

How the fuck can these be shown to be over 200,000 years old?

[–] Beast-mode-freak [S] 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago  (edited ago)

That's because they used Uranium dating, a new method that combined with these findings, warranted it being published in Nature, one of the best, peer-reviewed scientific journals in the world.

But you would know that if you'd actually read the article.

[–] yob 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Or read the actual science paper that stated methods and accuracy confidences :

Apidima Cave fossils provide earliest evidence of Homo sapiens in Eurasia
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-1376-z
Publisher: Nature Publishing Group
Authors: Harvati, Katerina; Röding, Carolin; Bosman, Abel M.; Karakostis, Fotios A.; Grün, Rainer; Stringer, Chris; Karkanas, Panagiotis; Thompson, Nicholas C.; Koutoulidis, Vassilis; Moulopoulos, Lia A.; Gorgoulis, Vassilis G.; Kouloukoussa, Mirsini



load more comments ▼ (26 remaining)