You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
4

[–] knuklz 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

This is not surprising based upon their history and lack of internal accountability. The Red Cross is a large organization and arguably one that has a relatively thick bureaucracy. Certainly, some immediate spending to hit goals on the ground in a disaster area can be difficult if not almost impossible to track. I do know that there are designated resources that are 'anointed' in disaster zones with the ability to spend money to solve an immediate issue. ie. contract a bulldozer to flatten an area to stand up tents or buy a pump and generator to provide water. Deeper accountability has always been difficult for the Red Cross. I always wonder though, is there FIFA like graft happening in the Red Cross. I would imagine that due to the large sums of cash and how it is spend, there would have to be some.

0
3

[–] bill.lee 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

I can't recall, but I thought there were similar concerns raised about donations following Katrina?

0
0

[–] BaIoo ago 

the american red cross pay their ceo $500,000 a year basic. if i'm going to be charitable i'm not going to pay an organisation to do it on my behalf, especially when so much of the funds are misused.