You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

1
134

[–] gramman74 1 points 134 points (+135|-1) ago 

Wasn't a bad article. Wasn't talking shit about us.

0
59

[–] SelfReferenceParadox 0 points 59 points (+59|-0) ago 

Same here. I was fully expecting the article to say something about how Voat is a secret paedophile meeting ground, but it was actually a little - dare I say it - nice.

0
18

[–] RR5td5 0 points 18 points (+18|-0) ago 

and now when someone starts google where is a secret paedophile meeting ground ... (:

0
10

[–] Trippin0ut 0 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago  (edited ago)

So this isn't the Super Adventure Club? Link for context

0
0

[–] Fagtardicus 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

IT BURNS USSSSSSSSSSSSSS!!1!

0
0

[–] jackieclay 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

nice

fuck you buddy

0
14

[–] MeinBlut 0 points 14 points (+14|-0) ago 

Exactly. Finally an article that understands what this whole issue is all about.

0
10

[–] Jxnfpm 0 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago 

Not the first one, but the first one from someplace as high profile as Time.

0
2

[–] irishredfox 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

I'm surprised that this article didn't mentioned Pao's gender. This article had a pretty neutral tone. I'm impressed. Time can still write some good articles.

0
1

[–] blazerjacket 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Pretty surprising. In my experience the Times seldom spends more than a "NY minute" researching any topic outside their traditional forum.