You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
2

[–] sane [S] 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

You are wise. Interesting. I bet they too were served papers, or on the cusp. The buyer needs to be informed of all pending litigation by law, else the deal is nullified though.

0
4

[–] 18629025? 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

From Salon:

Could President Trump, Justice Clarence Thomas and a Kentucky teenager make it harder for liberals to criticize conservatives by redefining what constitutes defamation in the United States? Nick Sandmann appears determined to do that.

Can anyone guess what I changed in this quote? It is obvious if you consider Salon wrote it.

0
1

[–] sane [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

MEMBER FOR 15 MINUTES?!? and SECOND POST?

Anyway, you basically REPEATED their typical propaganda , omitting one word "Donald" from their worried and panicked article about $250 million dollar suits :

https://www.salon.com/2019/02/20/covington-catholic-lawsuit-against-washington-post-has-very-tough-burden-to-overcome-libel-expert/

The salon article was not written by a lawyer, I believe, nor fact checked by one. His masthead says he (Matthew Rozsa) only has a Masters in History and thinking of completing a PhD in History.

The kid was NOT a public figure, and though he will NOT win for libel based on history of USA, he WILL win $$$ for his life being ruined, his limitations of college, his lifetime lost future earnings, his mental duress, his nightmares, the fact that he was a minor, etc etc. He will get millions of dollars. If he ALSO gets a few extra bucks for libel, that would be groundbreaking in USA.

0
1

[–] Sharipie 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

For that price, the buyer must be somebody who isn't really buying it so much as helping salon evade the lawsuits.