You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
7

[–] 18628936? 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

This is how they protect their money from lawsuits and the upcoming Covington Kid annihilation.

They continue to say whatever they want and now a new ownership structure isolates them further from any legal repercussion.

That is all this is.

0
2

[–] Sharipie 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

If they seriously were selling it there's no way they would settle for $5M. That amount is so low, it might as well have been zero dollars.

0
2

[–] sane [S] 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

You are wise. Interesting. I bet they too were served papers, or on the cusp. The buyer needs to be informed of all pending litigation by law, else the deal is nullified though.

0
4

[–] 18629025? 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

From Salon:

Could President Trump, Justice Clarence Thomas and a Kentucky teenager make it harder for liberals to criticize conservatives by redefining what constitutes defamation in the United States? Nick Sandmann appears determined to do that.

Can anyone guess what I changed in this quote? It is obvious if you consider Salon wrote it.

0
1

[–] Sharipie 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

For that price, the buyer must be somebody who isn't really buying it so much as helping salon evade the lawsuits.

1
0

[–] One-Way_Bus 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

You're right. The (((SEC))) will protect them.