You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

6
8

[–] Rum42 6 points 8 points (+14|-6) ago  (edited ago)

Apparently it was the board who was pushing for censorship, and she was the one defending free speech

1
11

[–] Zkv 1 points 11 points (+12|-1) ago 

Allegedly

0
5

[–] Rum42 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Thus the italicized "apparently"...

0
0

[–] Absolem 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

According to her.

0
4

[–] Imapopulistnow 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

I suspect it isn't this simple

0
4

[–] Rum42 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Nothing ever is.

0
3

[–] comrade_ouroboros 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Our free speech warrior. She should be our mascot ... quick somebody honor her by photo shopping her head on a goat.

0
1

[–] RobertWalker 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Are you trying to get sued??!?

0
1

[–] wtfduud 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Well she certainly made Voat a lot more popular.

0
1

[–] Azrael-sama 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

As long as she's tacked onto the tail end of it, then yes, let's do that!

0
2

[–] tame 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Given that she's now typecast as a hatchet-man/scapegoat interim CEO, appointing her is a bad sign for a company's users no matter whether she's there to make unpopular decisions or merely to take the fall for them.