You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

1
3

[–] BixNoodMufugga 1 point 3 points (+4|-1) ago 

In LA county, until the 70s, if a Mexican woman was having a second or third child with no father present at the birth, they'd just tie her tubes. A Jewish doctor found out and blew the whistle. I get how most of Voat feels about Jews, but they grow up to be doctors and lawyers at least. This guy was equating his own group with people who think Coke is healthier than water and tell their kids to drop out of school and work day labor. Like, come on.

Sorry for the novel, the point is we should still be sterilizing she-nogs and she-spics after the second baby. There won't be a country left in 20 years if we don't. It'll all be Mexico.

0
2

[–] Master_Foo 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Yep, Throw in a free tubectomy for every woman who gets an abortion. I'm happy with that. It's only $1,500, which is still less than the $2,500 in abortions this woman should have had.

After 18 years of welfare for a kid, a woman will receive $108,000. Compare that to $2,000 for an abortion and tubectomy. So, we are talking about spending 2% of what we are paying right now on welfare alone.

Imagine you are paying taxes. OK, nobody likes taxes. You figure out your share going to welfare is, say $1.00. OK, that sucks. Now, imagine, instead you could pay $0.02. THAT'S 2 CENTS INSTEAD OF $1.00!

Now, you calculate how much you are paying for prison... and same story... It was a big number... Now it's almost nothing.

And the people protesting in front of the abortion clinic call themselves Conservatives.

0
2

[–] BixNoodMufugga 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

I don't think it'll ever go down that far. There's always going to be someone who's legitimately disabled (Down Syndrome, quadriplegic etc) and requires assistance. But I have $1.00 for that person. What I don't have $1.00 for is a surly nog with a chip on its shoulder, who can't think beyond the present and has been raised to be dependent.