You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
118

[–] Ilisyer 0 points 118 points (+118|-0) ago 

A 5 round magazine? What would you do with those 4 rounds, commit a mass shooting?

runs away

Those 3 rounds are way too dangerous! And 2 rounds? Nobody needs 1 bullet in their gun!

jumps out window

You needed to turn in your guns yesterday!

There is never a reason to carry a knife and they must all have rounded tips!

Let Tyrone enrich you by raping and killing you, and setting you on fire! Mohammad can rape your children!

It's their culture!!

1
23

[–] eronburr 1 point 23 points (+24|-1) ago  (edited ago)

20 round a month limit means you better have good aim today because you can't even practice.

Does Oregon even have ranges? I can't imagine anyone paying to use a range knowing it takes 2 minutes to shoot 20 rounds and that's your monthly quota now. I don't think the 5 round capacity limit is too harmful because you could always just get more magazines, wasn't 5 the limit for more military in WW2 to prevent wasting bullets due to faulty magazines and gunk buildup?

0
8

[–] FuckshitMcDickTits 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

Lots of towns in Oregon have ranges. Portland doesn't have any that aren't a club with a $400 sign up fee and 2 seconds per shot rules.

Most people go out into the woods and shoot.

0
4

[–] Fred 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

20 round a month limit means you better have good aim today because you can't even practice.

The bill excludes ammo purchased and used at ranges. Still stupid of course, but at least they covered that angle.

8
-6

[–] Phantom42 8 points -6 points (+2|-8) ago 

The Kar98 used five rounds...

Seemed to work fine.

0
2

[–] RustyEquipment 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

it is cultural