You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
Probably not under certain cirmcumstances. That's why they always show intent, discuss some real planned future attack or event in the sting, like a "target in mexico" with him actively participating in buying components.
So if I had a gun store and you told me you had a target in Mexico, I also wouldn't be able to sell to you under that circumstance, and if I did I would be charged with the same offense? It's weird that the article doesn't say which law he broke, just that it was "federal charges".
view the rest of the comments →
[–] 9-11 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Probably not under certain cirmcumstances. That's why they always show intent, discuss some real planned future attack or event in the sting, like a "target in mexico" with him actively participating in buying components.
[–] black_listed ago
So if I had a gun store and you told me you had a target in Mexico, I also wouldn't be able to sell to you under that circumstance, and if I did I would be charged with the same offense? It's weird that the article doesn't say which law he broke, just that it was "federal charges".
[–] 9-11 1 point 0 points 1 point (+1|-1) ago
The illegal part was the conspiracy to commit terrorism.