0
68

[–] Adminstrater 0 points 68 points (+68|-0) ago 

Make no mistake: Affirmative Action is racist, discriminatory, and counter-intuitive for a meritocracy.

0
26

[–] Fullmetal 0 points 26 points (+26|-0) ago 

I agree. It needs to be struck down. Race should never be a consideration when choosing whether or not to admit a student to a school.

1
10

[–] GassyMcGasface 1 points 10 points (+11|-1) ago 

I disagree, they have taught us that if anything the majority of non-whites are incapable of adapting to a civilized society. Buh my gibs for da slavery. If they need reparations they need to talk to the majority salve owner/traders and I suggest they start with the false nation of Israel.

0
4

[–] shawnfromnh69 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Hell the only thing that should be on someones application is a number to represent the personal information and that should be basically random and the people choosing should not be able to see sex race or sexual anything because it is moot when selecting for secondary education. Only grades should be shown and awards unless they show race or gender then they cannot be included.

0
20

[–] censorthesenuts 0 points 20 points (+20|-0) ago 

Not just race. Women also benefit from affirmative action. The only ones who really get the shaft are, as always, white males.

0
4

[–] battleaxe253 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

No wonder the SJWs constantly preach the “affirmative action mostly benefits white women” narrative, even though white women are already the majority of the female population, so no shit? Regardless, somebody needs to pull the plug on AA and their gibs already.

0
10

[–] Schreiber 0 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Affirmative action is an excuse to exclude certain group of people in order to marginalize them.

Guess who are the most affected by it. Conservative straight white/asian males.

It's like a caste system based on how many "minority" tags you have.

0
4

[–] newoldwave 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

mainly it is clearly unconstitutional

[–] [deleted] 0 points 46 points (+46|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
17

[–] Samchay6 0 points 17 points (+17|-0) ago 

I'm sure it's just a coincidence.... that happens over, and over, and over, and over again.

1
3

[–] Redcobra 1 points 3 points (+4|-1) ago 

You deserve top spot so far

0
11

[–] lord_nougat 0 points 11 points (+11|-0) ago 

such shocking!

0
4

[–] Pluviou5 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Acljew.

0
0

[–] Goys-R-Us 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

You did nazi that coming?

0
44

[–] BlackOwl 0 points 44 points (+44|-0) ago 

"We will discriminate against white people as much as possible, even if it means having to discriminate against certain minorities to get it done."

0
8

[–] mirimar [S] 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

That is a perfect summation of what they wrote!

4
24

[–] OhRutherfordBehave 4 points 24 points (+28|-4) ago 

ACLU has made it clear that they will not protect civil rights if it means defending white people: https://reason.com/blog/2018/06/21/aclu-leaked-memo-free-speech If the speech does not advance social justice, they will not protect it.

Also, Jewish nepotism is off the charts at Harvard in so many ways, and a lot of research can be done into this, but i'll just leave this: https://www.hillel.org/college-guide/list/record/harvard-university It says 57% of grad students, it used to be 66%.

And i don't give a shit about asians BTW. They don't belong here, they aren't Americans, and we don't owe them anything as if they were Americans.

1
5

[–] captainstrange 1 points 5 points (+6|-1) ago 

The Japanese are traditional nationalists like white europeans used to be.

The chinese/mainlanders are a bunch of ant-people.

World of difference between the two.

2
6

[–] sir_andy_of_bad 2 points 6 points (+8|-2) ago 

I respect the Japanese and still don't want a bunch of them here.

0
2

[–] Schreiber 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

If the speech does not advance social justice, they will not protect it.

Right, this is why we must kill everybody who wants to advance "social justice."

I can tolerate everyone and everything except those who wants to advance "social justice."

0
0

[–] oldzeke 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

The 66% figure is still visible here: https://archive.fo/TG7nk

Interesting that they since brought it down to a nice round 2500 grad students.

0
21

[–] BlackOwl 0 points 21 points (+21|-0) ago 

"Discrimination against whites is paramount, even if it comes at the expense of certain minorities."

1
18

[–] derram 1 points 18 points (+19|-1) ago 

0
9

[–] shawnfromnh69 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

So I guess liberties only apply to minorities and illegals but I say taxpayers should only have liberties since they are the bill payers. Like my father "you can do that when you pay the bills but when your under my roof...." A lot of us have heard that one.

0
7

[–] l_voated_today 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Benefiting whites = bad

Also an admission that affirmative action is anti-white

load more comments ▼ (28 remaining)