You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →


[–] CowWithBeef 2 points 11 points (+13|-2) ago 

I can't tell if Jones is controlled opposition so I can't really understand what is happening. The principles are easy. The details are mind bending. Who does he really work for?


[–] fuckingmockies 0 points 21 points (+21|-0) ago 

Well, I've said this a half dozen times but I guess I'll say it again to someone new.

Imagine you are the Cabal the rules the world. The people need to be controlled, so give them Fox News and CNN. 85% of people are content to pick a side and feel self righteous about the choice and mock the ignorance of the other side.

But 15% of people don't buy it. They need to be controlled too, so what do you do?

You give them the truth. Well, you give them a portion of the truth. And you deliver to them via a big personality who uses these partial truths to lead you to false conclusions.

Enter Alex Jones.

Do you really think he'd have been allowed to get as big as he has if he wasn't controlled? If he was the real thing, he'd have been quietly removed long before he was a household name. He'd either have had a heart attack or they would have found child pornography on his computer.

So what is Alex Jones job? It's twofold. First, HE does the investigation and reports HIS conclusions. Secondly, he adopts a personality just crazy enough to immediately discredit himself to the 85%, but not so bad that the 15% become skeptical.

Here's an example. Do you remember the "It's Okay to be White" campaign? Little harmless flyers were posted everywhere with that benign statement. The Left freaked the fuck out about it. Do you remember? And what did Alex Jones do? He pounced on it immediately and started merchandising shit that said, "It's Okay to be White, It's Okay to be Black, It's Okay to be Brown; it's GREAT to bring human."

So what did he accomplish by doing this? Easy. He took something that was meant to raise awareness to the global anti-white pogrom and he reframed it to make it appear that all races are equal.

Or how about the way he freaks out about "Radical Islamic Terrorists"? Be honest with yourself. Do you really think Arabs would be any less savage and stupid if you somehow erased Islam from their minds? No. Their religion is shit tier but their incompatibility with Western nations is much deeper than that. It's racial.

But Jones is a Civic Nationalist. And he convinces others to become Civic Nationalists as well. Civic Nationalism is right wing virtue signaling designed to get you to cheerfully embrace the white genocide happening worldwide. Ayy.


[–] Adam_Jensen_ 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

If that is the case, why hasn't this site been removed?


[–] TheTrigger 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago  (edited ago)

It's not mainstream enough to be that important. Right now, voat is in a containment/observe/record stage. We're their guinea pigs, a testing ground for control and subversion. Their pulse on how much pressure is in the cooker. They've figured out how to control normies, with Facebook et al. Now they need to figure out how to shut us up, and be happy to do it.

We get funneled in to smaller and smaller containers, until we're fragmented all over the internet, in to our own little niche corners. Voat, phuks, 8ch, gab, etc... until they eventually succeed in dividing and conquering. They are slow and deliberate.

I guarantee you that most of the super extremism on voat is intentionally set up to scare away squeamish centrists, who might otherwise be exposed to (and understand) our ideas, over time. They either run back to Reddit, and learn to self-censor: letting them win. Or: they run off and make their own smaller playpen: just as planned.

Voat, 4ch, etc., will continue to exist— for as long as they can't beat us in to submission. They'd rather wage this war on these spaces, out of plain view, than out in the open: where everyone can see.


[–] PuttItOut 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

I guarantee you that most of the super extremism on voat is intentionally set up to scare away squeamish centrists.

You're not wrong.


[–] ignorantoptimist 1 points 1 points (+2|-1) ago 

Is saying hitler did nothing wrong super extremism in your minds?


[–] PuttItOut 0 points 13 points (+13|-0) ago 

You must be new around here.


[–] ignorantoptimist 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago  (edited ago)

No, i've lurked here for around 2 years. I didn't figure that statement was super extremism in your mind, but I'm wondering what exactly is? Is it talking about killing niggers or something like that? And I only ask this question because it is not always that easy to pinpoint the paid subversion specialists.


[–] PuttItOut 0 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago 

There is always two ways to say the same thing: respectably or with vulgarity. One way is meant for discussion and education, the other is an act of aggression. People respond to these in kind. If our purpose is to educate the unknowing (aka red pill the masses), then vulgarity turns them off, and the message is never heard. Vulgarity destroys Voat's purpose because it turns away the very people that need the enlightment while doing nothing for those already enlightened.

Voat has a lot of vulgarity and most of it is planted and intended to turn people away. And it works and it's why they do it.