You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

3
22

[–] WilliamCutting 3 points 22 points (+25|-3) ago  (edited ago)

Tolerance of socially destructive behavior is what got us here.

Saying "I dont care what you do in the bedroom as long as your quiet!" Is a nice sentiment but ultimately is just a foothold for these freaks to infiltrate your institutions. It started with the quite strange teacher who likes to dress like a woman in private and ended with a tranny dressed like a demon teaching your kids its cool to be trans

None of this is a 'slippery slope phallacy' as some would whine, this is literally what happened.

Social and legal moral standards don't need to be Christian but they do need to be based in factual scientific reality. Unnatural things ultimately harm healthy societies and in the very least need to be kept away from kids who can't process this on their own.

7
4

[–] o0shad0o 7 points 4 points (+11|-7) ago 

Hum. So. Where do you set the limit on this "intolerance"? Do you police the public, looking for deviants? What do you do with them when you find them? "Socially destructive behavior" - I'm guessing you think the same is true about drugs, so you're fine with the war on drugs. (Well, you may think it's not good enough, CIA involvement, insufficiently strict, hang drug dealers, etc.)

IMO it's a hell of a quagmire and capable of concealing worse things under the guise of "protecting society". Don't like someone? Accuse them of witchcraft being gay!

I think the key is the word "behavior". If their behavior is affecting you, you have the right to take steps to prevent it. Otherwise, mind your own damn business.

4
3

[–] WilliamCutting 4 points 3 points (+7|-4) ago 

You are conflating so many things and spinning a hell of a strawman from my point. I get it, everyone is afraid that a society that protects itself from jewish degeneracy is going to find out about their guilty cummies.

How about this very simple fact. Just because there can be possible abuses of something or its unlikely false positives does not mean you have to throw out something that will be a net social good.

The Third Reich did a pretty good job of policing things deemed degenerate as well as throwing a blanket amnesty on things that took place during the Weimar republic. The key here is understanding what degeneracy actual is and why it is so harmful to our society.

As far as telling people to keep their behavior to themselves and mind their business. Too bad, they are not content with keeping their behaviour private since these people are basically a social infection. They have an impulse to spread and have been doing just that, its why you see rainbow flags on City halls and all over modern corporate logos. Its why you can't just 'tolerate' these freaks, you have to EMBRACE and love them.

Sorry but your idea of just living in your own corner and letting to each their own has already failed. These people want to see your famiies twisted and your children mutilated. If the real right ever succeeds we can not give these people another chance at the same game.

1
3

[–] 1True_Morty 1 points 3 points (+4|-1) ago 

Fuck that. If you're a disgusting piece of garbage, let the whole neighborhood know. No government involvement required. Go read the Scarlet Letter.

0
0

[–] Silencedmajor 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

How about reducing the corporate and government pandering and virtue signaling for a tiny fraction of society for a start?

The platform that has been given to the social engineering Marxists that hate the society that has allowed them to have a voice in the first place needs to be lowered to the level of importance they actually have. Which is less than 2%.

There will be no need for Mccarthy style witch hunts in the future if that was the case.

0
0

[–] vladtep 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

We can just like...do what we did before. Read a book. lol

0
2

[–] hafen 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

The whole tyranny argument isn't very clever. Keeping it out of schools is possible, but enforcing what goes on in the bedroom tyrannically is not only almost unenforceable, but brings about more issues than benefits. The case for a libertarian freedom is much stronger here. You allow people to learn and make human mistakes that make them more resilient. If the default is conformity or jail time, there would be no virtue in conformity. It's a view of people that sees them as unconscious animals. Virtue is being allowed to do some weird shit, and then not doing that weird shit. (i.e. choice) Laws outsource a lot of that decision making out to the state, and so you end up with a maybe partially virtuous populace, however mostly you get a cowardly, non-virtuous, weakened one. Also, just because I tell you it's virtually unenforceable through tyranny, does not not mean it's unenforceable through other means.

None of this is a 'slippery slope fallacy' as some would whine

Wrong. Throughout history, some sized percentage of people have always done weird shit, it's that the social enforcement went on the decline. The religion, was in a weakened state culturally, due to the weakened state fundamentalism put it in, and shallow arguments atheists used to deconstruct it.

2
1

[–] Schreiber 2 points 1 points (+3|-2) ago 

Agreed.

We need to repress them and our society should punish them for their degenerate behavior.