2
89

[–] Guy_Justsome 2 points 89 points (+91|-2) ago 

Fine. I'm a transvestite who likes to wear a suit and tie; please don't judge me by my taste in clothing, or by my physique. All shapes are valid.

I'm a manish-looking lesbian trans woman married to my cis female spouse with three kids. Please don't break up my gay rainbow family with your opressive judgementalism.

0
27

[–] peacegnome 0 points 27 points (+27|-0) ago 

exactly what i was thinking, it's a way to raise the trans numbers or kick companies out of the state. honestly, i don't see why any company would be based out of CA right now.

0
23

[–] fuckinghell 0 points 23 points (+23|-0) ago 

I think the article mentioned only 441 companies this would apply to.

Think about that, in a state with one of the largest economies in the world, only 441 publicly traded companies.

Soon to be far less, I'm sure.

0
1

[–] CuriosityOnFire 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

I'm based in rainbow nation and have residence there

file for greater center of interest for aliens or whatever the tax doc is called

don't pay me a salary.

pay the employment corporation that employs me

that is in a 0% tax jurisdiction from god himself

[–] [deleted] 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

1
8

[–] alphasnail 1 points 8 points (+9|-1) ago 

And using the wrong pronoun is illegal in California. The moment they call you a man then drag them through the legal system for as long as possible.

0
2

[–] Kick_Start 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

What if I identify as a woman but prefer “he/him/his” pronouns? I’m non-comforming, you bigot.

0
1

[–] HeavyBrain 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Won't work because the mentally ill judges see when you try to face the degeneracy.

And even if not, they won't belive what a white man claims and yes they determine it by looks.

[–] [deleted] 1 points -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

[Deleted]

0
7

[–] Shaigorath 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

As crazy as it sounds it’s the only way for us to fight this. Use thier weapons against them.

0
4

[–] andrew_jackson 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Crazy? Doesn't sound crazy. It's epic trolling.

1
0

[–] viperguy [S] 1 points 0 points (+1|-1) ago  (edited ago)

Regreatably part of the law is written using lower case word "female" not uppercase "Female" which means literal female or post-op female or whatever passes for legal female in california for that section of the law statue. I am talking about the lowercase word female in this part of the law the senate passed :

SEC. 2. Section 301.3 is added to the Corporations Code, to read:

301.3. (b) 1 : If its number of directors is six or more, the corporation shall have a minimum of three female directors.

So you would have probably a one year grace period in transition to prove you are going to chop off your dick , or prove your dick is chopped off. (At least if you are a tranny on a 6 human sized board, lacking 3 cis females)..

0
3

[–] Norm85 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

I'll identify as female for a cushy board job.

0
0

[–] xenoPsychologist 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

should get some knockers, too. itll probably help.

1
29

[–] Silencedmajor 1 points 29 points (+30|-1) ago 

So they just want everyone sane to leave the state before it drops into the ocean, after God smites the shit out of it?

0
11

[–] Floodthewestcoast 0 points 11 points (+11|-0) ago 

See username

0
1

[–] Hand_of_Node 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Oregon and Washington are the only states that could potentially "drop into the ocean". Maybe a tiny bit of the extreme northwest California. See the Cascadian fault. Plate sliding under the northwest has pushed it up. When that finally snaps, the coastal northwest will be toast, a very soggy toast.

3
-1

[–] viperguy [S] 3 points -1 points (+2|-3) ago 

Fun fact... those used to be deep under the ocean. Most of that area has whale skeletons NOT dinosaur skeletons.

Return to the sea I say!

1
16

[–] thelma 1 points 16 points (+17|-1) ago 

The California Assembly must pass SB 826 by the end of August, and Gov. Brown must sign the legislation, for it become state law.

No law yet....but what about all the closet trans people? Discriminates against them.

And the lesbians !!!!!!! They'll have a field day with this.

0
2

[–] WitnesstheSalt 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

As long as the lesbians identify as female they're included. Doesn't make the proposed law any less insane, mind you.

0
1

[–] Pwning4Ever 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

This would be a great gift for midterms. Go Jerry go!

3
0

[–] viperguy [S] 3 points 0 points (+3|-3) ago  (edited ago)

IT WILL PASS!!!! The senate was the ONLY hurdle.

Trust me, it will pass unless Rush Limbaugh , Savage, and Fox News, have fiun with it on air for a few weeks. Then they MIGHT modify it from "3 out of 6 mandatory" to "2 out of 6 mandatory" and still pass it,

You only have to identify as female, or claim to be, not dress female, and lesbians typically identify as female , but tranny females (FtM) of course identify as men so i get your joke.

[–] [deleted] 1 points 2 points (+3|-1) ago 

[Deleted]

1
12

[–] ADaniels 1 points 12 points (+13|-1) ago 

It’s also legal to lnowlingly infect others with HIV in California......

1
4

[–] BLOODandHONOUR 1 points 4 points (+5|-1) ago 

Its not legal- it has been lowered from a felony to a misdemeanor. Still retarded and jewed but you are incorrect and spreading disinformation.

0
6

[–] 00001000001100110101 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

The penalty is low enough that it may as well be legal. It's like moving murder from a felony to a misdemeanor charge. sure, it's still illegal, but it's the difference between jail time and a 50$ fine

0
2

[–] Schreiber 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

If there is actual justice, the punishment for knowingly infecting others with HIV should be torture and public execution.

There is no justice in America for decent folks, there's only justice for criminals and dregs of the society.

Honestly there's no other way, but to slaughter and purge every single leftists on earth, in order to right what is wrong.

0
2

[–] ADaniels 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Lol, im Not spreading disinformation, being reduced from a felony is as good as legal as far as penalties are concerned...... but thnx for the correction.

0
0

[–] i_scream_trucks 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

incorrect and spreading disinformation.

and aids.

2
2

[–] ScreaminMime 2 points 2 points (+4|-2) ago 

I'd love to hear someone slipped HIV into the legislature's morning doughnuts...

0
11

[–] Weasel_Soup 0 points 11 points (+11|-0) ago 

Easy, double the size of your board and hire low paid token executives that don't matter to fill the quota.

0
8

[–] shittersfull 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

then they win the unequal pay argument

2
3

[–] viperguy [S] 2 points 3 points (+5|-2) ago 

Directors need not get more than a single dollar a year in compensation. Even Steve Jobs only was typically paid a single dollar. As for stock options, those are never equal between board members, but vary based on what the director brings to the enterprise, clout, connections, time, legal expertise, science knowledge, etc etc. But I do agree that if 3 females have chump change stock options, and the three original white men have biollions of dollars ... the pee squatters will sue for "MY GIBS!"

In fact this the female 50% of 6 board members law is the first step of requiring that half the board be african negro trannies in upcoming california laws.

1
3

[–] viperguy [S] 1 points 3 points (+4|-1) ago  (edited ago)

FOOLISH. The board's low paid females would vote immediately to fire all the men "threats" one by one, until all low-stock-moneyed female, and then gut the company and drive it into a quick exit merger payout after enriching their female purses, after altering compensation of the board.

0
2

[–] Hand_of_Node 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Ellen Pao might be available.

0
2

[–] WitnesstheSalt 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Counter: one of your token hires warms her seat for a few months, then decides she'd rather have fame over your paycheque. She goes to the media to make a stink about being a token hire with no power and gets to do a book tour, powered by the fire she set in your boardroom.

1
9

[–] Bill_Murrays_Sandals 1 points 9 points (+10|-1) ago 

This forced agenda will eventually backfire spectacularly on all of those who thought it was a great idea to replace a fair meritocracy based system for employment with this retarded SJW 'inclusivity' nonsense turd sandwich.

0
4

[–] weezkitty 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

I would hardly call what we have a fair meritocracy. But this makes it far, far worse. Personally, I'd feel pretty insulted if I were a woman and hired just to fill a quota. Is it really such an insane concept to hire people based on competence rather than demographic quota?

0
8

[–] eggsbenedict94 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago  (edited ago)

The inherent problem with laws like this is that it ignores the possibility of there simply not being enough competent women and mentally ill men around.

Either way, California should be nuked ASAP.

0
5

[–] Shilly_Mc_Shillface 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Lulz: competent women

0
1

[–] midnightblue1335 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Women are very competent. In the kitchen.

0
7

[–] draaaak 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

Maybe this is why Elon Musk wants to take Tesla private.

0
3

[–] weezkitty 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

I can't really blame him there. Shareholders is why the ethics of so many companies go down the toilet

0
0

[–] viperguy [S] 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago  (edited ago)

No, his is already safe being a delaware corporation.

He wants to take it private because he borrowed 50% againt his 20% ownership of TELSA, and that collateral is gravely endangered in a forced stock liquidation in a graduated one day market crash if his stock drops to 50% of the level he took the loan out using his own stock as collateral.

IN ENGLISH : If for whatever reason 'TSLA' stock goes down far enough and Elon cannot cover his massive loans on his own shares, a huge amount of his stock is sold creating a VICIOUS CIRCLE. If he can pop up or manipulate the stock momentariliy higher, and sell some off, he can use THAT CASH to protect his remaining shares.

4
-4
load more comments ▼ (69 remaining)