You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
0

[–] Saufsoldat 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Pathetic attempt to changing the subject with a very transparent strawman argument.

0
0

[–] Stormisbrewing [S] 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

The only pathetic one here is you. You'll just have to accept that some people will take Israel Shahak's word for it rather than yours. Most of us don't have time to read the Talmud, and even if we did, we'd be reading an English translation full of omissions. So guess what? If Israel Shahak's statements can be refuted by simply asserting they are not true, then the same is true for your assertions.

1
-1

[–] Saufsoldat 1 points -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

You'll just have to accept that some people will take Israel Shahak's word for it rather than yours.

Once again, this is not one word against another's, this is about a testable, provable claim that you could easily verify for yourself, but you refuse to because it would go against your narrative.

Most of us don't have time to read the Talmud, and even if we did, we'd be reading an English translation full of omissions.

Another attempt to dodge the issue. When I say "Mein Kampf says that taking a cock up the ass is great fun", you don't have to have read the entire book to disprove this claim.

So guess what? If Israel Shahak's statements can be refuted by simply asserting they are not true, then the same is true for your assertions.

Except I'm not just asserting it, I am making a very easily verifiable statement that you can search through the talmud and will not find any such statement. Again, you refuse to do this because it would disprove your entire argument in two minutes.

This is just sad. You have completely abandoned all pretense of an argument.