You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
13

[–] Eualos 0 points 13 points (+13|-0) ago  (edited ago)

That probably shouldn't be allowed, they should be able to have in person visitation. You're basically punishing the person who didn't do anything but denying them in person interaction with their loved one.

1
8

[–] sir_andy_of_bad 1 point 8 points (+9|-1) ago 

Exactly. So many people here are giving in to the same hatred that the leftists have. They're no better than them. That's what a lack of belief in anything gives us, exactly what the kikes want.

0
5

[–] Eualos 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Beliefs and morals are important

2
1

[–] midnightblue1335 2 points 1 point (+3|-2) ago 

No, you're denying the person that you're punishing for crimes the privilege of being in person with their "loved ones". If they really cared about their "loved ones", maybe they shouldn't have committed a crime and gotten themselves locked up?

Voat is becoming more and more like reddit. You faggots are crying because filthy criminals are actually being punished a little now. These assholes have access to incredible amenities in prison; cutting them off from the outside world is kind of the point of imprisoning someone. Fuck 'em. Wanna spend time with your family? Don't be a goddamned criminal. It's that simple.

0
3

[–] talmoridor-x 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Yes goy, obey the law!

The definition of "criminal' has changed dramatically in the last century. Laws are getting ridiculous. Look at CA and the plastic straws ffs.

0
1

[–] Eualos 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Not cutting them off, but keeping them out of society for everyone else's safety is the point.

Not everyone is an animal. Just the violent criminals. It's not for the criminals it's for the people who care about them. They didn't do anything wrong they don't need to be punished for the sins of their loved ones.