0
8

[–] edistojim 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

First it was plastic straws now its lunch. Do these stupid fucks have anything better to do? Can anyone explain how you can ban a business cafeteria on private property ? The ones running this shit show are seriously mentally ill.

0
4

[–] monkeytoe101 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

The cafeteria lunch is not free. The employees already pay for it with their labor. Whether they choose to partake in it is up to them.

0
3

[–] SmokeyMeadow 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Ban San Francisco.

0
3

[–] Gringojones 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Supply and demand.

Everyone who wants to open a business does not have the right to customers. They have to earn customers.

If I open a shoe shine business in SF, will they ban sneakers?

0
4

[–] Guy_Justsome 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

The same principles apply at the ballot box: San Franciscans voted for control-freak politicians who social-engineered their city into shithole conditions. Now they're social-engineering the sheep to wade around in the shit like they're supposed to.

The people of San Francisco have spoken.

0
3

[–] Demon 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

I'm so sick of the left wanting the government to address every "problem" they see.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
3

[–] GapingAnus 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

A little of column A, a little of column B. Giving out huge loans to people who can't pay won't magically make them able to pay. Neither is it a sound policy to ignore the issue, re-bundle the "assets" into obscure financial instruments which you can flog to the goys, inflating a bubble that you hope won't pop while you're holding it.

And what gets lost in the noise is that there are absolutely things the government should stay the fuck out of and there are absolutely things we should charge the government with fixing or maintaining because private interests either don't care or actively work against them. The real world is complex. I don't want government sneakers and I don't want the Coca Cola Army.

0
2

[–] drozzxd 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

“This is the beginning of a conversation. We think it’s appropriate conversation to have now. We absolutely have that authorization,” said Supervisor Safai.

Safai, rhymes with diversity hire nigger.

0
2

[–] Sellyoulight 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

There should be some way we could just ban San Francisco--or better yet, all of California and the Pacific NW.

0
1

[–] IGiveZeroFucks 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

PNW is mostly red. It's just fucking Seattle and Portland that need to go.

0
2

[–] HeavyBrain 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

That’s because restaurant owners say they can’t compet

Well fuck, back to the good ol (school) days where you bring your own lunch.

thousands of employees in a block radius that don’t go out to lunch and don’t go out in support of restaurants every day

Well maybe provide food that is better than the free shit you get in a company cafeteria and they will come.

Next, there is the dangerous precedent this ban would set. If they can ban employer-provided lunch because it hurts local business, that opens up a whole can of worms SF doesn’t want.

Well why not, "libshits hurt my gun business", "fat sjw protesting hurt my fit/izen/ store." "Hiring women hurts muhhh busness feelz" Use their own shit against them.

load more comments ▼ (8 remaining)